The leader of Romania’s right-wing nationalist party, Claudiu Tarziu, made a controversial proposal in a speech delivered in Iasi on Friday, suggesting that Romania should abandon its NATO membership and collaborate with Russia to partition Ukraine. Tarziu asserted that Romania’s true sovereignty could only be achieved by reclaiming its historical borders, even if it meant sacrificing its affiliation with the Western defense alliance.
Addressing his supporters, Tarziu outlined specific Ukrainian regions he believed should be annexed, including Northern Bukovina, Southern Bessarabia, Hertsa region, and Transylvania, emphasizing the need for these territories to return to Romanian control. He expressed a willingness to build closer relations with Russia, acknowledging the historical complexities of their relationship but insisting on Russian commitment to cooperation.
The official stance of Tarziu’s party, the Alliance for the Union of Romanians (AUR), is critical of NATO, viewing it as an obstacle to the realization of a Greater Romania. The party contends that Romania’s NATO membership has come at a significant cost to the country’s interests.
However, many critics argue against such a proposition, highlighting the potential risks and emphasizing the importance of Romania’s NATO membership as a strategic security measure. They point out the historical tensions with Russia, citing instances of territorial losses and the unresolved issue of the Romanian treasure worth of 120 tons of gold, stolen by Russia after World War I and never returned.
Concerns are raised about Russia’s historical approach, characterized by taking rather than giving. Detractors note Russia’s attempts to manipulate Moldova, a region with Romanian ties, into remaining within its sphere of influence, potentially risking the Russification of the region.
Opponents of the nationalist proposal argue that Romania should not forget the lessons of history, highlighting past oppressions, land thefts, and the economic burdens imposed by Russia. The call for improved relations with Russia is met with skepticism, given the historical baggage of communism, Ceausescu’s dictatorship, and the economic hardships endured by Romania in the aftermath of World War II.
Moreover, critics stress the strategic importance of having Ukraine as a buffer state between Romania and Russia, emphasizing the need for a geopolitical distance to avoid direct bordering with a nation that has historically posed challenges. The caution extends to Turkey and Bulgaria, with a reminder of historical grievances and the potential drawbacks of direct borders with former empires.
In conclusion, the proposal to align with Russia and abandon NATO raises concerns and prompts a reassessment of historical grievances and geopolitical considerations.
RELATED ARTICLES
- After Fooling the People to Reelect Putin, Russia now announces More Cannon Fodder Mobilizations
- Russia Fires Barrage of North Korean Missiles at Kyiv After US Visit
- Ex-Wagner fighters Join Free Russia Army's Battle to Liberate Russia from Putin Occupation
- Hungary Becomes First EU Country to Congratulate Putin for Winning the 'Elections'
- Putin says NATO Troops are already in Ukraine But Russia is Still Winning
Loading ...
