Science teachers must stop using terms including “parent,” “men,” “women,” “mother,” and “father” because they are “oppressive”, according to the National Science Teachers Association (NSTA).
The largest association of science teachers in the world has issued a guide for “anti-oppression” terminology for science teachers, which includes instructions to refer to men as “XY individuals” and fathers as “persons with testes.”
In the guide, titled “Gender-Inclusive Biology: A framework in action,” the National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) mothers are now referred to as “persons with ovaries” in reference to reproduction cycles. The NSTA also announces its support for biological men competing in women’s sports, declaring the move of various states toward “Sex verification in sports” as an example of oppression.
Jonathan Turley reports: The use of such a guide by a state school would raise serious First Amendment issues. We have already seen successful litigation challenging mandatory pronoun usage, including the recent litigation involving a teacher in Loudoun County, Virginia. Yet we have also seen new cases, including the charging of three high school students for not using preferred pronouns.
Under the new guidelines, teachers are encouraged to drop terms like “male” in favor of “XY individuals.”
The NSTA suggests that this can be a fun exercise like having students come up with an entirely new name for the word “parents,” such as “gene-givers” or “biological life transmitters.” This is not likely to be viewed as a fun exercise by some teachers or students, including those with opposing deeply religious views.
I happen to believe that teachers can and should address different gender identities in relevant courses. However, this type of sweeping guide, if made mandatory or enforced through “microaggression” policies, could contravene constitutional protections.
It is important to keep this guide in its proper context. The guide does not call for mandatory rules in schools barring the use of these terms. The guide is not calling for Father’s Day cards to be converted into “Happy Person with Testes Day.” However, we have seen such guides cited as the basis for sanctions, including allegations of hostile classroom environment or micro aggressive speech.
What is the purpose of deleting such words? Are they preparing the grounds to legalize and promote incest? Like once you don’t name a mother and a father as such then who is this person living with me in the same house? Yeah why not have sex with this person? Its easy sex, why go around looking for a partner when there is this “person” here in my house I could have sex with very easily, a person I trust, so yeah why not?
Now seriously, WHY is the question? Why a daughter should not call her father, “father”? Should she call him by the name? Hey X, how are you buddy? What is the purpose of this? Where will this lead? If a girl doesn’t have a “father” at home but a “XY individual” or “person with testicles” and if a boy doesn’t have a mother at home but he has a “person with ovaries”, what’s next?
These efforts to remove such words from society can only have ONE SINGLE GOAL, to incentivize and promote incest. Why else would you teach children in schools not to call their parents “parents, mothers and fathers” if not for preparing the grounds for incest? What moral barrier will keep these kids from demanding sex from their “persons with testicles and ovaries” when they grow up???
It is generally assumed that the deletion of such words from people’s vocabularies is for transgender kids so they can feel good or something but this is probably not the case. They already achieved their goals with transgenders. Transgender is generally socially accepted in USA and much of West Europe. The removal of these words is preparing the stage for something else, how would it help transgenders which is already legal and socially accepted, not to say “mother, father and parent”? The removal of such words does however break the family bond and will result in the normalization of incest.
We actually talked about this in a previous article where we asked the question, what’s next? What other taboo will they legalize, well it seems that this is the one. In the next 5-10 years incest will probably be legalized worldwide. While this is not as bad as homosexuality, it is still a sin and God says NO, DON’T DO IT in Leviticus 18:6-26.
RELATED ARTICLES
- UK Woman Charged with double attempted murder after Poisoning her own Children
- Man Caught on Camera Punching Random Women in Barcelona Metro Station
- French Man Pretended to be Alien Prophet to Sleep with THOUSANDS of Women in the 90s
- Spike Protein Makes Women 'Infertile', Scientists Warn
- Court Sides with 12-Year-Old Girl Refusing to Take Covid Vaccine Against Her Will
Loading ...
