From today on, it is ILLEGAL in the UK to dislike and express your opinion that you do not agree with transgenders! If you say anything at all that criticizes transgenders, transsexuals, transvestites and ordinary gays it is now punishable with a minimum of 6 months in jail and up to 6 years.
The punishment is going to be harsher than those that are given for domestic burglaries. Make no mistake about it, this is absurd indeed, its as if you are thrown in jail for not liking candy.
It is your right to like and dislike whatever the hell you want, its called FREEDOM, but in today’s society, freedom is becoming a thing of the past.
Transgenders have obtained a special status of favorite people so watch out what you say and what you think. Bow down and obey your masters which you voted for!
The most interesting thing in all of this will be the Muslims and where will they fit in all of this because they are the ones who hate gays more than any other group of people and they run their mouths openly and they are also a special protected class so, seriously, this is going to be interesting to watch the clash of the Muslims VS Gays in the near future.
So in case you thought we were joking, unfortunately, we were not, here’s the story as reported in the Daily Mail:
Judges have been ordered to hand out tough jail terms in a crackdown on transgender and homophobic hate crimes.
Offenders found guilty of stirring up hatred on the grounds of sexuality should get at least six months in prison, new sentencing guidelines state.
And there should be a six-year jail sentence for those convicted of the worst cases of intolerance against gay or transgender people.
The instructions, released yesterday by the judge-led Sentencing Council – the statutory body that recommends punishment levels – mean transgender hate offences will receive harsher sentences than domestic burglaries.
It comes after police figures revealed reports of hate crimes soared last year, with transgender hate crimes up 37 per cent on the year before.
Mr Justice Julian Goose, of the Council, said the guidelines would help the courts take a ‘consistent approach’ to sentencing the offences, adding: ‘Public order is essential for the safe-functioning of society and the law seeks to protect the public from behaviour which undermines this.’
The instructions, which will come into effect on January 1, follow a series of cases in which police have been accused of launching heavy-handed investigations into transgender hate crime allegations.
This year Surrey Police quizzed a Catholic mother-of-five after she was accused of ‘misgendering’ the trans daughter of an activist on social media by using the pronoun ‘him’.
Last week Thames Valley Police launched an inquiry into possible public order hate crimes by demonstrators who put up stickers in Oxford with messages such as: ‘Woman: noun. Adult human female.’
The guidelines, which judges and magistrates must follow unless they can show doing so would run against justice, are the first to apply to public order offences – which include the offence of ‘stirring up hatred based on race, religion or sexual orientation’.
This is the only public order offence for which offenders can be convicted for what they say, write, broadcast or post on the internet or social media.
Most cases of hate crime sentenced in the courts are convictions for ordinary offences – considered aggravated – because the criminal targeted a victim from a minority group.
The Sentencing Council said the least serious offences of stirring up racial hatred, in which people spread hate ‘recklessly’ without intending to do so, should be handed community punishments rather than jail time.
But the same does not apply to spreading hatred on religious or sexual orientation grounds.
For these offences, the new rules say the least serious offences should attract a six-month jail sentence.
For those who commit the hate crime from a position of authority, or plan to incite serious violence or whose activity was persistent and widespread, the typical jail sentence should be three years and as much as six.
By contrast, the Council’s rules mean burglars can avoid jail with a community sentence.
The Council said it wanted to reassure ‘concerned respondents the guideline is not politically influenced or motivated’.
But prison charity The Howard League criticised judges for advocating short jail terms.
It told the Council’s consultation: ‘The guidelines should be encouraging the use of effective community programmes rather than expensive, ineffective short-term prison sentences.’
In case you’ve had enough of all of this craziness, and you just want to get away and live a normal life, then read this story of ours where we offer a practical guide as where to move to.
RELATED ARTICLES
- EVs pollute 1850 times more than Fossil Fuel cars according to new study
- UK Warns that China is Preparing for Total Nuclear War with the West
- Spanish Priest Faces Up To 3 Years In Prison For Criticizing Islamic Extremism
- Jacob Rothschild Dies At Age 87
- UK Government-Funded Study Found Virtually No Dental Benefit From Fluoridation
Loading ...
Sick pandering to a mental disorder.
6 years prison in UK for disliking perverts? Who is voting for these politicians?