The UK’s mass surveillance program is in violation of human rights, the European Court of Human Rights has declared. The challenge was instigated following the revelations from US whistle-blower Edward Snowden.
The court stated there is “insufficient oversight” and “inadequate safeguards” over the government’s ‘bulk interception’ of communications. Furthermore, it found the UK “was not in accordance with the law” over it’s obtaining of communications data from service providers.
The landmark case, brought forward by Amnesty International and the civil liberties campaign group Big Brother Watch, among others, was instigated by the leaks of Edward Snowden. NSA whistle-blower, Snowden, revealed the extent of British and American surveillance and intelligence practices in 2013.
Following the leaks, the complainants suspected that British and US spy agencies may have intercepted their electronic communications.
Corey Stoughton, an advocacy director at human rights group Liberty, described the ruling as “a major victory for those of us who think there ought to be balance in the government’s ability to engage in surveillance.”
During an interview with the Guardian, Snowden warned that the practices of UK’s Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) were “worse than the US.”
Subsequently, Britain has changed their surveillance laws since the legal challenge began, the government claims that the new legislation contains more privacy protections.
RELATED ARTICLES
- New Cars Report All Your Driving Habits to Data Brokers and Insurance
- EVs pollute 1850 times more than Fossil Fuel cars according to new study
- UK Warns that China is Preparing for Total Nuclear War with the West
- Jacob Rothschild Dies At Age 87
- UK Government-Funded Study Found Virtually No Dental Benefit From Fluoridation
Loading ...
