Nonwhite invaders pretending to be refugees in Germany committed 457 crimes every day in 2017, including at least 267 murders—of which half of the victims were Germans—according to official figures released by the government.
According to the latest Kriminalität im Kontext von Zuwanderung (“Criminality in the Context of immigration”) 2017 report issued by the Bundeskriminalamt (“Federal Criminal Police Office”), 167,268 “non-Germans and immigrants (asylum-seekers)” were arrested during that year for serious crimes.
This works out to 457 arrests per day, every day, for 365 days.
About 40 percent of the arrested fake refugees came from the “main countries of origin of the asylum seekers,” namely Syria (20 percent), Afghanistan (11 percent) and Iraq (8 percent).
These three groups together made up 61 percent of all “asylum seekers” in Germany in 2017.
The proportion of arrested fake refugee criminals from the Maghreb states Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia was 9 percent, while their share of “asylum seekers” was only 2.4 percent of the total.
The rest were made up of other nationalities, mostly Gypsies and other mixed race individuals from the Balkans or southern Russia.
The overwhelming majority (87 percent) of the arrested invaders were male and 66 percent were younger than 30 years old.
This means that 13 percent of all the fake refugees arrested in 2017 were female, while they made up 34 percent of all “asylum seekers” in that year.
There were 5,258 recorded sex offenses committed by the fake refugees in 2017, a marked increase compared to 2016, when there were 3,597 such attacks.
“Significant increases were recorded in the numbers of suspects from the African states of Nigeria and Somalia,” the report added.
The breakdown of victims revealed that the vast majority were Germans: 46,057 nonwhite invaders pretending to be refugees who were victims of a crime committed by their fellow fakers, while 95,148 Germans were “victims of crime involving at least one immigrant.”
Other figures detailed in the report revealed that in 2017, “asylum applicants” were, on application, categorizes as follows:
– 27 percent claimed to be “children” under 14 years,
– 8 percent claimed to be “adolescents” aged 14 to 18 years,
– 11 percent claimed to be “adolescents” aged 18 to 21 years,
– 54 percent admitted to being adults aged 21 years and older,
– 73 percent were under the age of 30,
– 66 percent were male and 34 percent were female.
Furthermore, out of 600,000 “asylum decisions,” made in 2017, some 230,000 applications were denied—but only 24,000 were deported.
RELATED ARTICLES
- EU to use Russian assets to buy arms for Ukraine
- German School Bans Children from Drinking Water Because its Offensive
- Turkish students film themselves beating and torturing 12-year-old German child
- Germany will arm Ukraine with Indian Artillery Shells
- UK Elderly Couple Ordered in a Council Letter to Sell Their House as its Needed to House Migrants
Loading ...
Angela Merkel has endangered all of Germany for generations to come. The children of today’s children will be forced to live in a police state to keep the muslims in line until the day their (the muslims) numbers have grown large enough to make them refugees.
Why is it the responsibility of any European country to give these “refugees”(most are economic refugees) a better life? Europe has nothing to gain by letting or bringing these people in. Europe, your first and last obligation is to your people. What do the “refugees” have to offer? They bring nothing to the table but unwanted problems.
Why don’t muslim “asylum seekers” go to Qatar, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates , Oman, Saudi Arabia or any of the other rich muslim countries? These are Islamic countries therefore more suitable for them.
Has any European country benefited by opening it’s borders to non-Europeans? Name one. Do they make Europe a safer place to live? Have they made Europe great? Are they good for tourism? Do they bring anything positive to Europe? Do they respect the citizens of Europe and the customs? Do they support themselves without burdening the tax payers? Do they burden the judicial system due to high crime rates? Do they love Europe or what they can get from her?
Do they victimize the European people in large proportions to their small numbers? Wouldn’t crimes against the European people foreshadow their true intentions? Do they trash up the areas they inhabit in Europe? If they victimize the host country’s people and trash up their land after they have been given a new start at life, wouldn’t that be like a direct “screw you”? Do they demand you to change your ways and customs so they can tolerate you? Do they respect the peoples government? Your family? Your people? Your culture?
If they are guilty of three of these questions then It would be safe to say they should not be in Europe. There is more harm than good for Europe and her people.
If a European country don’t let the hordes flood their land they are called “far right” “racist” “Nazis” and “xenophobic”. If they let them in, their country, their lives, their descendants lives will be torn apart. Which one is easier to live with? Which one does the most damage? Which choice is beneficial to the European country and it’s people? Hint: A name will not destroy a country and it’s people. Europe, wake up and take a stand before it’s too late and you lose everything.