Labour encouraged mass immigration even though it knew that voters opposed it, Whitehall documents confirmed yesterday.
The Government said the public disagreed with immigration because of ‘racism’ and ministers were told to try to alter public attitudes.
The thinking on immigration among Labour leaders was set down in 2000 in a document prepared for the Cabinet Office and the Home Office, but the key passages were suppressed before it was published.
The paper was finally disclosed under freedom of information rules yesterday. It showed that ministers were advised that only the ill-educated and those who had never met a migrant were opposed to immigration.
They were also told that large-scale immigration would bring increases in crime, but they concealed these concerns from the public.
Sections of the paper, which underpinned Labour policies that admitted between two and three million immigrants to Britain in less than a decade, have already been made public.
These have showed that Labour aimed to use immigration not only for economic reasons but also to change the social make-up of the country.
Fuller details released yesterday showed that Tony Blair’s ministers opened the doors to mass migration in knowledge of public opposition and with the view that those who disagreed with them were racists.
Shadow Home Secretary Chris Grayling, left, has criticised Immigration Minister Phil Woolas for not telling the truth about migration policies
Labour’s accusation that opponents of immigration are racist has been dropped over the last two years as it has become clear that former Labour voters in party heartlands have been turning to the far right British National Party.
Ministers accept there is frustration at the loss of jobs to migrants and pressure on public services.
Yesterday Shadow Home Secretary Chris Grayling said: ‘The Government has simply not been telling the truth about its policies on immigration.
‘More and more evidence is now emerging to show that they deliberately planned a big jump in immigration for their own political purposes.
‘Now they are trying to rewrite history to pretend those decisions never happened. Their conduct over all of this has been a complete disgrace.’
Sir Andrew Green of the Migrationwatch pressure group said: ‘This report confirms that ministers deliberately rode roughshod over public opinion in adopting a policy of mass immigration.
‘They concealed their real intentions in the hope that they would benefit from the immigrant vote without losing their working class supporters. They are now paying the price.’
But this morning Border and Immigration Minister Phil Woolas described the accusations as a ‘complete fabrication’.
‘It’s an old story. It’s based on a report that was ten years ago that wasn’t accepted by ministers at the time,’ he told Radio 4.
‘For Migrationwatch, which is meant to be non-party political, to be playing this game, it’s all about the election. This is pure smear politics.
‘It’s not true that there was a deliberate policy to have mass migration policy. Neither is it true that there was an attempt to open the doors.
‘The acts of parliament throughout this period have been trying to control the global increase in migration and what the right are really worried about is that we’ve now done that with the figures coming down, the new points-based system, electronic borders.’
Mr Woolas said the Conservatives could not ‘stand the idea’ that Labour was on top of immigration.
David Cameron promised yesterday to limit immigration to tens of thousands a year, a level last seen in the 1990s.
RELATED ARTICLES
- EVs pollute 1850 times more than Fossil Fuel cars according to new study
- UK Warns that China is Preparing for Total Nuclear War with the West
- Jacob Rothschild Dies At Age 87
- UK Government-Funded Study Found Virtually No Dental Benefit From Fluoridation
- UK Elderly Couple Ordered in a Council Letter to Sell Their House as its Needed to House Migrants
Loading ...
Sadly this type of information is still not enough to stop people voting Labour…yet. They are responsible for the government spending deficit of £156bn and Britain is about to become seriously out of pocket over the next two years.Then there will be more support for the BNP.But one story that is being suppressed by the UK libel laws is the two former Labour Ministers suspected of accesssing child pornography on a US website. Even this story will not put people off voting Labour, they are of weapons grade stupidity.
Any white person who continues to vote Labor hates himself, his family, his country, his race. All whites in Britain should if they have any self respect repudiate Labor, outlaw that party.
I only have one question for the British politicians.
Why can a white South African not be classified or allowed to become an asylum seeker? We are hard working, educated and would be a plus to your economy.
I just dont understand why you allow anyone and everyone into your country who does not want to work, you fuck your own people to look after the immigrants!
What was that story about the soldier who lost his house due to it being occupied by immigrants?
It really boggles the mind, what is wrong with politicians?
Is it open season to fuck whites in the world!!!
Its all part of their plan to create Babylonian confusion. Mix the races up so badly and cause so much strife that everyone will be more than happy to have a New World Order; a One World Government, just so that order can be reestablished.
Many Whites have gone into collusion with the jews while at the same time screwing over other Whites. These traitors to our race must be put to death! We must also not forget that many people who claim or appear to be White are actually mongrels and mamsers; being part jew themselves.
History PROVES beyond any shadow of a doubt that a homogeneous white society is one which reaches heights of civilization unmatched in the entire world. Whites could exist just fine, in fact we could excel beyond our wildest imagination without one mud (and certainly without the demon jew) whereas all other societies fall apart without White influence.
“You {non-Jews} resent us {Jews}, but you cannot clearly say why…Not so many years ago I used to hear that we were money-grubbers and commercial materialists; now the complaint is being whispered around that no art and no profession is safe from Jewish invasion…
We shirk our patriotic duty in war time because we are pacifists by nature and tradition, and we are the Arch-Plotters of Universal Wars and the Chief Beneficiaries of those wars. We are at once the founders and leading adherents of capitalism and the chief perpetrators of the rebellion against capitalism. Surely, history has nothing like us for versatility!…
You accuse us of stirring up revolution in Moscow. Suppose we admit the charge. What of it?…You make much noise and fury about undue Jewish influence in your theaters and movie palaces. Very good; granted your complaint is well founded. But what is that compared to our staggering influence in your churches, schools, your laws and your government, and the very thoughts you think every day?…’The Protocols of the Elders of Zion’ which shows that we plotted to bring on the late World War. You believe that book. All right…we will underwrite every word of it. It is genuine and authentic. But what is that besides the unquestionable historical conspiracy which we have carried out, which we never have denied because you never had the courage to charge us with it, and of which the full record is extant for anybody to read?
If you really are serious when you talk of Jewish plots, may I not direct your attention to one worth talking about? What use is it wasting words on the alleged control of your public opinion by Jewish financiers, newspaper owners, and movie magnates, when you might as well also justly accuse us of the proved control of your whole civilization…
You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt. We are intruders. We are subverters. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and have played havoc with them. We {Jews} have been at the bottom of not merely of the latest war {WWI} but of nearly all your wars, not only of the Russian but of every other major revolution in your history. We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life. We are still doing it. No one can tell how long we shall go on doing it…Who knows what great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left you alone.
But we did not leave you alone. We took you in hand and pulled down the beautiful and generous structure you had reared, and changed the whole course of your history. We conquered you as no empire of yours ever subjugated Africa or Asia. And we did it solely by the irresistible might of our spirit, with ideas, with propaganda…
Take the three principal revolutions in modern times, the French, the American and Russian. What are they but the triumph of the Jewish idea of social, political and economic justice? And the end is still a long way off. We still dominate you…
Is it any wonder you resent us? We have put a clog upon your progress. We have imposed upon you an alien book {Scofield Bible} and alien faith {Judeo-Christianity, a false Christianity} which is at cross-purposes with your native spirit, which keeps you everlastingly ill-at-ease, and which you lack the spirit either to reject or to accept in full…We have merely divided your soul, confused your impulses, paralyzed your desires…
So why should you not resent us? If we were in your place we should probably dislike you more cordially than you do us. But we should make no bones about telling you why…You Christians worry and complain about the Jew’s influence in your civilization. We are, you say, an international people, a compact minority in your midst, with traditions, interests, aspirations and objectives distinct from your own. And you declare that this state of affairs is a measure of your orderly development; it muddles your destiny. I do not altogether see the danger. Your world has always been ruled by minorities; and it seems to me a matter of indifference what remote origin and professed creed of the governing clique is. The influence, on the other hand, is certainly there, and it is vastly greater and more insidious than you appear to realize…
That is what puzzles and amuses and sometimes exasperates us about your game of Jew-baiting. It sounds so portentous. You go about whispering terrifyingly of the hand of the Jew in this and that and the other thing. It makes us quake. We are conscious of the injury we did when we imposed upon you our alien faith and traditions. And then you specify and talk vaguely of Jewish financiers and Jewish motion picture promoters, and our terror dissolves in laughter. The Gentiles, we see with relief, will never know the real blackness of our crimes…
You call us subversive, agitators, revolution mongers. It is the truth, and I cower at your discovery…We undoubtedly had a sizable finger in the Lutheran Rebellion, and it is simply a fact that we were the prime movers in the Bourgeois Democratic Revolutions of the century before last, both in France and America. If we were not, we did not know our own interests. The Republican revolutions of the 18th Century freed us of our age-long political and social disabilities. They benefited us…You go on rattling of Jewish conspiracies and cite as instances the Great War and the Russian Revolution! Can you wonder that we Jews have always taken your anti-Semites rather lightly, as long as they did not resort to violence?”
(Marcus Eli Ravage (Big Destruction Hammer of God), member of the staff of the New York Tribune, “A Real Case Against the Jews,” in Century Magazine, January-February, 1928).
STRIKE THE ROOT! KILL THE JEW!
The Labour Party should be tried for treason and publicly hanged.
james,watch this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQJFv9SMSMQ