Finally! After 30+ cases in the US regarding Obama’s presidential eligibility because he is Kenyan-born, not Hawaiian-born, one court from California has accepted to call Obama on trial on January 26, 2010! At one case, a corrupted judge even fined Orly Taitz, lawyer and activist with $20,000 for constantly trying to call Obama on court. The given reason for the huge fine was that she was “abusing the court”.
AXJ members in Santa Ana, CA., USA are confirming information from the Court Room that the Honorable Judge David O. Carter has granted defendants standing in this case, has dismissed the DOJ’s motion to dismiss, and has ordered immediate discovery.
All those that go against this Court Order will be held in Contempt of Court.
US Marshalls are preparing to make the Order efective in the State of Hawaii and the Embassy of Kenya in Washington, D.C. will be receiving a copy of the Rogatory Letters.
More to come…
Judge Carter Denies Motion to Dismiss, in Barnett vs. Obama!
off a blog; http://thepostnemail.wordpress.com/
Judge Carter Denies Motion to Dismiss, in Barnett vs. Obama!
October 7, 2009 by John Charlton
COURT ORDER FINALIZES SCHEDULE FOR TRIAL!
by John Charlton
(Oct. 7, 2009) — Today was published the Court order resulting from the Oct. 5th hearing in Barnett vs. Obama, issued by federal judge, David O. Carter, in the Southern Division of California.
The order, reads as follows:
On September 8, 2009, the Court previously set tentative case management dates. The Court now orders those dates be made final.
Case Management dates are as follows:
Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing — December 7, 2009, at 8:30 a.m.
File Motion for Summary Judgment — November 16, 2009
Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment — November 26, 2009
Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment — November 30, 2009
Final Pretrial Conference — January 11, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.
Jury Trial — January 26, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.
The implication of the Court’s order finalizing the dates is obvious: you do not finalize dates unless there will be a trial. And there would not be a trial, unless the Motion to Dismiss requested by the Defense was in whole or in part DENIED!
Trying to confirm, but this means it will be heard on the merits!
Orly’s site has been updated!
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/
Actual order from judge Carter:my case Barnett et al v Obama et al is going to trial, dates are final, January 26 is the date for the jury trial
Posted on | October 7, 2009 | No Comments
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
CV-90 (12/02)
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL Page 1 of 1
Case No. SACV09-0082 DOC (ANx) Date October 5, 2009
Title CAPTAIN PAMELA BARNETT, ET AL. V. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ET AL.
Present: The
Honorable
David O. Carter, U.S. District Judge
Kristee Hopkins Debbie Gale N/A
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Orly Taitz
Gary Kreep
David DeJute, AUSA
Roger West, AUSA
Proceedings: 1. MOTION BY DEFENDANTS TO DISMISS CASE
2. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
Cause called and counsel state their appearances. Argument by counsel. Motion taken
under submission.
On September 8, 2009, the Court previously set tentative case management dates. The
Court now orders those dates be made final.
Case Management dates are as follows:
Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing December 7, 2009, at 8:30 a.m.
File Motion for Summary Judgment November 16, 2009
Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment November 26, 2009
Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment November 30, 2009
Final Pretrial Conference January 11, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.
Jury Trial January 26, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.
3
: 21
01
Initials of Preparer kh
Case 8:09-cv-00082-DOC-AN Document 81 Filed 10/05/2009 Page 1 of 1
Category: Events, HOT ITEMS!, Latest News, Legal Actions, Supporting Documentation
You can see the response from Roger West, lead attorney for Obama
Posted on | October 7, 2009 | No Comments
Flag this message
Laconic Response from AUSA Roger West
Wednesday, October 7, 2009 12:03 PM From: This sender is DomainKeys verified “Charles Lincoln” View contact details To: “Dr. Orly Taitz” RE: Dr. Taitz seeks stipulation re: Discovery. Mittwoch, den 7. Oktober 2009, 11:31:18 Uhr
Von: “West, Roger (USACAC)” Karte anzeigen
An: Charles Lincoln
——————————————————————————–
Nuts.
From: Charles Lincoln [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 11:11 AM
To: Dejute, David (USACAC); West, Roger (USACAC)
Subject: Dr. Taitz seeks stipulation re: Discovery.
Dear Messers DeJute & West:
Dr. Taitz has asked me to ask you whether you are willing to stipulate that, now that the Scheduling Order has been made final, rather than moot, that it is now time for us to begin discovery. We need to start sending out notices of deposition duces tecum to parties and subpoenas duces tecum to non-parties. The Judge specifically said that the Scheduling order would only be important if the case were going to go forward, and he seems to have spoken on this point.
Charles E. Lincoln, Research Associate & Law Clerk for Dr. Taitz, Esq., Attorney for the Plaintiffs.
Deo Vindice
“May the Lord God be with you,
and with thy spirit!”
My assistant, Mr. Lincoln has contacted Roger West, assistant US attorney, lead attorney representing the defendants, asking to stipulate to discovery in light of today’s order by Judge Carter. You can see his polite and constructive response “Nuts”. I wonder, if I wasn’t a woman, if I was a part of good old boys club, would there be a more appropriate response.
Loading ...
The truth about obama needs to be out there for every American. This is one of the greatest cover ups in the U. S. Why is obama spending so much money to keep his records secret? I smell a rat!
We, as Americans simply want and require the truth about this obama character who seems to have a hobby of lying to the American people. We’ll see for sure.
“A bird in the the hand”
“Paris in in the spring”
I had students for 40 years who could not see the above items as they were written, with an extra “the” or “in”. They continued to read the sentences as if the extra words did not exist. And so it is with the birthers. They cannot see the obvious flaws in their thinking and their obvious disconnect with the legal system and the Constitution. No matter what evidence exists against them, they will not acknowledge it, choosing instead to let it be that extra word they cannot see.
Want something to worry about? If Carter rules that the )o( is not eligible, old Joe is nothing but a citizen being there was never a valid election. So it is Botox Nancy for 3 months until we can hold another election and start over back to January 20 2009. There will probably be a military take over to keep the peace. Hopefully the military will be on We The People’s side and not the New World Order Communists that are trying to reform our America.
Remember that when Bill Clinton was placed into the office of the president, it was well documented — known and understood (by some) that he had issues with sexual promiscuity that would allow others to remove him from office later at their discretion. According to Mr. Clinton in an interview, he asked Newt Gingrich why he was being taken down and was being attacked as president. Clinton said he was told in response by Gingrich, “Because we can!” The same people who put Clinton into the office of the president knowing full well that he could be taken out later, and that the result would be a destabilized nation, were not very different people than those who put Obama into office. They have their agenda, and it bears remembering that when we see anything happen in the media, it is usually the tip of an iceberg, and that most of the reality behind the illusions of the media dog-and-pony show are beyond the knowledge of the media consumers (a.k.a., “the people”). So even when we think we know what is going on, we still don’t really know what is going on. That is the condition that best serves the interests of those who prefer to remain out of the public eye while they pull the strings from behind the scenes. It is an old and well-worn tactic to “use the sentiments of the people against them.” As long as people let their emotions do most of their thinking, anyone who can get hold of those emotions can steer their thinking for them. Without even knowing it this country can be turned upside down, and people can be made to be turned against one-another without their ever realizing that they have been duped on a grand scale by people they never knew about, and therefore never suspected.
Obama will go to trial on January 26, 2010 on Eligibility Case in California
This is probably not good news. What a lot of people don’t get is that circumstances have been and will be arranged so that no matter what happens, Americans lose. Nothing we do gets us back our country. We have lost the democratic control as a people. No amount of legal wrangling or appeasements will change the course of events. Since Kennedy was assassinated and the White House was taken over, the notion that we still had a democratic republic has amounted to little more than window dressing. The nation has been engineered for failure — slowly and systematically removed from a nation of, by, and for the people, and has been replaced by the kind of secret and despotic usurpation that Eisenhower tried to warn us about (but he was too late, even then). When he talked about how “only a well-informed and diligently involved populace would save the nation from the “military-industrial complex,” he already well understood that as a nation we were no longer that involved in our government.
It is worth bearing in mind that Obama’s rise to a position of great
influence did not occur in a vacuum. While the nation was surprised —
even astonished — that a black man could be elected to the office of
the presidency, most Americans never thought about the fact that for him
to have made it that far in the first place, he had to have the nod from
certain non-public sectors, without whose support he would not have
stood a chance. So no matter what happens with Obama, those who were
responsible for putting him into office (read as not “the people,” but
rather those who engineered his victory) are still around, and will
still control the nation.
Based on what I understand about how things work, if Obama is found by any means to be ineligible to hold the office of the presidency, it is something that the “invisible government” knew about in advance, and was counting on. It will give leverage to the ill-does who now control the country and were responsible for setting the country up with 3 of “their” choices for president — allowing us to only vote for one of their three (serious losers all — not a single true patriotic DEMOCRATIC American among them — all very self-serving).
If Obama is not displaced, we have already suffered, and will continue to suffer some serious setbacks as a nation (though not as badly as if we had McCain or Hillary on board). If Obama is displaced, his replacement will likely not have the country’s best interests at heart, because those who now control the White House by illegal and un-Constitutional means will never relinquish their hold.
It is an unfortunate time in U.S. history. I see nobody who understands the nature of the problem and who is prepared to offer any sort of viable solution that would restore the nation from damage done to-date. It may be at this point that we can only sit back and watch the plans for depopulation materialize as China and Russia decide how to divide up the spoils.
Birth Certificate?
Does it matter….?
Let’s see his passport records.
HIs Occidental College records
all other school records.
From Elementary on up.
His federal aid and status as
a minority in College/Univ.?
How many times, if ever, has
Obama scammed the system?
————————-
You see, you can get these (well not you), but anyone is serious enough.
Just go to Indonesia and ask to see his school record. And you are right all of these documents that you say would have his place of birth.
OBama with his name would had to produce his proof of citizenship multitude of time and as someone who has to do it often, each time a secretary makes a photocopy of it.
In other words copies of documents stating his place of birth are scattered around and hundreds of people mus have seen it. YET NO ONE HAS COME OUT. Is Obama controlling each and everyone of them? His power reaches to Indonesia and Pakistan (when entering Pakistan he had to show his passport and had to be photocopied)?
Your hatred seemed to have gotten better of your intelligence and common sesne. You rather believe in the fantastic that Obama somehow managed to scam everyone in the world, instead of more simple explanation, that his birthplace in these documents which were made available LONG BEFORE he may even have dreamed of running 4 the president; is simply what he has claimed.
Was the $20K fine enough? Maybe when Taitz becomes a real lawyer she will appreciate what just happened. I wonder if she is a mail order bride, just like her law degree? She is perfect reporter material for “Fake News”, where unfounded rumors and innuendo reign supreme , unlike a our US courts of law, where you need to present documented facts, not half baked lies (prepare for more failures). When flies get too close to the lights they get burned, Taitz just got burned, thing is, like a fly she will continue, no end in sight. Poor little Birthers they are haters not debaters.
A lawyer, dentist, realtor and black belt, wow I must say a JACK of all trades master of none.
Bad news! Judge David O. Carter hired a Obama lawyer 4 days before the October court date. What is he doing with this move?
Birth Certificate?
Does it matter….?
Let’s see his passport records.
HIs Occidental College records
all other school records.
From Elementary on up.
His federal aid and status as
a minority in College/Univ.?
How many times, if ever, has
Obama scammed the system?
We need to prove so much to
get a drivers license, a passport,
a Visa, asecurity clearance.
Why would anyone think the president
should not prove his eligibility?
There are many questions and we,
the people deserve answers.
Under submission does not mean Judge Carter has dismissed the DOJs dismissal request. Sorry I wish it did. It simply means he will no longer take any evidence or information from either side. He has still not rendered his decision on the DOJs dismissal request. I wish this was not so. But we are still in the fight, but have not won it as of yet.
I hope I read this right! Is the DOJ dismissal order rejected by Judge Carter for sure and not just that court dates are issued and recorded, and has discovery already been addressed.
America may have hope if these two assumptions are correct. This is the first I have read about the dismissal being rejected. We can only hope.