Home » Europe, Immigration, Manipulation, Politics » Who really rules France behind the curtain


Who really rules France behind the curtain

 
 
 
 
submit to reddit

11

France decided: “It’s better to be led by foreigners rather then our own French people!”

African and Arab immigrants simply destroyed France in the last 2 years just because “it’s France” and what was the French peoples answer to this? “Don’t vote with a patriot that is against immigration, vote with a Jewish immigrant from Hungary that will bring some more aliens.” How smart… I must admit that they are “geniuses”!

It is fundamental to understand exactly who and what the new French president is. He is the man hand-picked by certain Americans to play the role of a spoiler, such as the presidents of Poland and the Czech republic.

Why they have chosen a foreigner, is because they want to be sure of his loyalty toward them, and Israel.

These Americans have follow now, as they have for almost 100 years, the politics of division in Europe successfully engage in by England since Elisabeth the first in the 16 century.

Who really rules France behind the curtain?

The major problem in modern France is related to the coming of the Rothschild family, and other affluent Jewish bankers like Lazard Freres, etc.

But that they are not alone is because the influence and the power of the Freimaurer (freemasons) are very strong. In the course of two centuries, they where able to buy and control the press, to make a monopoly out of it, with the power of their purse, then the next steep was to buy the corrupt politicians who where waiting just for that.

They hatched the same plot in the USA. Starting to control the newspapers at the time of the civil war, the powerful Jewish bankers were on the move. But in reality the roots of all these modern problems came from the French revolution.

The French revolution was created by the peoples yes, but controlled and directed by the bourgeoisie (Freimaurer,) who had the desire to take the place and privileges of the nobility.
It was a plot made by the freemasons, largely infiltrated already by the Jewry since the beginning of the eighteen century.

Their aim was to destabilize the monarchist regimes by spreading anarchy in the kingdoms of Europe and give an advantage to England. (England is the only Christian kingdom in Europe to ennoble a Jew.)

Their ideas were to make a paradise for the merchant bourgeoisie, of course at the expense of the working class and the nobility. In short, we did switch a regime leaded by a pig (the king) and end up with 1000 pigs acting like barons with voracious appetites for leading the nation: For their own profit. A very ruinous venture indeed.

Shortly thereafter came Napoleon, who freed the Jews from their ghettos in Eastern Europe, and by the same token welcomed them in France with their purses full of money (war – cost money).

Since that time they are, without any doubted in control of the political and economic scenery in France.

France, across the last 70 years, has been a haven for immigrants; first from European countries’, people like Armenians, Spanish refugees from their civil war, Italian workers, Poles, Yugoslavs etc, came after the Second World War. They were assimilated with no problems, but at the expense of the purity and the character of the Frankish blood.

The population of France was only 42.000.000 in 1946.

Today in big cities sadly, you see everywhere faces, which do not belong to our ethnic stock, and culture.

Those people who pretend to be the minority get more from social services than the ethnic French, who become socially second-class citizens in their own country.

It is important to know, that in the entire world white Caucasians are only 9.5% of the population. That makes our white people the real minority.

The arrogance, and the demand of those immigrants are an insult to French workers overloaded with taxes supporting those social parasitic programs.
That goes to the absurd in taxation.

Example – when you own a house you have to pay property taxes, that’s OK; most civilized countries do that, but in France now, on top of this tax, you have to pay about the same amount of money as habitation tax for living in your own house!!!

France was a country very much divided politically, during the second WW. Half the population did welcome the coming of the Wermacht to France, and following that, the coming of Marshall Petain as chef of state, who then made friendship with national socialist Germany.

De Gaulle, who was an opportunist, did benefit from that division. He fabricated, with the complicity of communists the legend of the French partisan.

The true fact, is that it is only a legend. The partisans in France were very small number, incapable of doing any serious harm to the regime of Marshall Petain. They built their power base on lies and deception after the war through the complicity of the Jewish controlled press.

After the war, everybody was a partisan!!! As in Germany, nobody was a nazi after the war!!! That should tell you. What is human nature.

So they have made new history by silencing and censuring the truth.

I will give you a piece of information you will never see all your life in the news media services:
It is the “law of the 7%” of Carl Jung, the sociologist and philosopher.
Carl Jung’s law of 7% says you have 93% of the people who behave like sheep anywhere in the world, but that law says also that if those 7% are united and active, no regime can stop them.

Why have the French tolerated the invasion of 15 millions of unsanitary savages with low IQ in their country? Well that has to do with the decadence and devirilisation of the French man, in all aspects of life.

The French are trendy, they like to follow fashion, if someone important says it is OK to be a chmull, they give their ass right away!!! They are cool!!!

The riots of last year did scare the French, poor darlings, but not enough to make them vote for the Front National, which need badly by the way, a new leader with charisma.

They need someone who will replace Le Pen with brio.

The party possess this man, a man with a great intellect, a professor (of Japanese language and civilization) at the university of Lyon. His name is Bruno Gollnisch, and he has the intellectual capacity to be a man who can stand brilliantly in the arena of national and international political affairs.

Hulas, why this man is not presently the candidate for the Front National, is a good question.

It is because there is an internal struggle, with petty politics inside the party to grab power. Besides that it seems Jean Marie Le Pen wants to be the prima Donna forever, like those old actors who do not want to retire in time, before ridicule strikes them.

I know Jean Marie, and I Know well his narcissistic tendencies.

The biggest handicap for Gollnisch is the daughter of Jean Marie Le Pen (Marine), who aspires to be the leader of the party after her father’s departure. Her competence is far away from being the equal to that one of Gollnisch, also she has demonstrated liberal tendencies several times, contrary to the political will of party members, and also antagonist behavior against Bruno Gollnisch.

The Front National did score 15% in the last presidential election in 2000. Today only 10.4%; it is time for the party to do some spring-cleaning.

In my opinion the lack of precision on the social agenda and programs of the party, which does not define an allegiance to a known system of rules, but rather to a vague form of republicanism, proven with time to be political cacophony?

The philosophy of Jean Marie is; as long you like France, you are accepted, black or white it does not matter, (this philosophy will not save our race and our culture).

Remember our enemies strive only when there is disorder. An orderly regime will not tolerate oligarchy and waste. The republican system leads only to plutocracy.

What are they in the Front National? Are they liberal democrats, communists, fascists, socialists; nobody knows for sure…

Most of the people like to identify themselves with a party line. People generally do not like venturing in unknown exotic political territory.

The reality for us is that most of us are socialist-oriented people. We want to preserve our culture and our race from vanishing. We do not accept Marxist Socialism, we are a “schism” of socialism like that of the Protestant and Catholic Church, our socialism is European.

So then, in order to be clear to people about our political intentions, it will be better to label the party name with the word Socialist. Example; Socialist Volk party.

Our enemies have capitalized on that, by labeling us Right Extremists. By doing that they have convinced workers that we are on the side of bourgeoisie bosses and are not a party fighting for the proletariat good.

The bourgeoisie are only for money, not for principles. Remember, the bourgeoisie manipulate, they do not fight on the streets, and they are paper tigers. When the proletariat show their muscle, the bourgeoisie want to deal right away; they are merchants.

You cannot expect anything honorable from them, and you cannot trust them — ever. Remember they are the ones who betrayed the Fürher. They will do the same with us; it is in their nature.

Smartly by labeling us right extremists, they have also protected their socialist party against competition.

The party on the right side of the political spectrum does not like the idea of having a new socialist party which can be more successful than the old one, and which will keep its promises to the workers. So, consequently, the left and the right are united to stop us from growing(!)

I do believe we will win in the end. Our enemies make plenty of mistakes, they milk the cow and do not feed her enough. One day, one straw will break the camel back. We have to be vigilant, and ready for that moment Kameraden.

What will Sarkozy do?

Nicolas Sarkozy did capitalize on, and benefit from the riots of the last years and that did condition the French to vote for him with the hope to see the immigration closed, and the disorder stopped. His coming fit the Jewish calendar in France. Is it because the Jews are scared of the Arabs?

Probably he will try to buy the neutrality of Arabs in France, by giving them more rights and money — at the expense of the real French workers, of course.

Personally, I do not think this strategy will work well for him. The Arabs and the Blacks will take the money, and will continue the pursuit of their agenda — and the French will be more taxed.

One thing also is sure, the business owner will not like to be forced by the government to hire those people from the third world who do not have the same work ethic and the qualifications of European people. Consequently they are not attractive to be hired for complex work, and there is already no room for little jobs.

Sarkozy will benefit all the time from the Jewish press whatsoever happens.

The Americans will probably create an incident in the middle east so that Sarkozy will be the solver of problems; and by being that boost his image. I hope the Palestinian will not be so naïve about this.

It is a dangerous situation; we have the wolf inside the shepherd’s house.

The socialist party will not fight hard against Sarkozy in the future because Jews will heavily infiltrate them at the command post and will neutralize any attempt to dethrone Sarkozy.

The only problem I can see for Sarkozy is, if he displeases his own party,and by using a too obviously pro-American politics, he might be dumped by his own party. At that point his chance to stay in power will be in jeopardy.

I am sure Sarkozy will try to break the Paris, Berlin, Moscow axis, for the benefit of the Americans.

The opponent of Sarkozy, Segolaine Royale was not a serious choice from the socialist party, and I wonder if the Jews inside the socialist party, like Mr. Kahn, did make their strategy by deliberately pick up Segolaine Royale, knowing in advance her chances for failure; in order to give free room to Sarkozy. The manipulation in that case would not be noticeable.

Whatsoever, Sarkozy will have to be prudent and walk on tiptoes. One thing is sure he is a filou (crook, swindler) and looks like one. His public manners are not refined. He is not smart enough to concoct international politics — not even national politics. He is only the front man. Perhaps one day he will think he can do better then the people who are blowing order in his ear: That day, he will be doomed.

Please wait...


RELATED ARTICLES

Did you like this information? Then please consider making a donation or subscribing to our Newsletter.

Conversation Guidelines

Starting a conversation on our website is very easy, all you need to do is to write your name, email and the comment itself. No account is required to leave a comment. Your email won't be used for any purpose whatsoever, if you want, you can even write a fictitious email. Please keep it civil, try to refrain from slurs and insults. We offer Free Speech rights to our comment section but please take note that the comment section is moderated so certain comments may be held for moderation in case they triggered our automatic filters. If your comment is on hold for moderation and you can't see it anywhere there is no need to repost it. Don't worry, it doesn't mean it won't get approved. Please patiently wait and check back later.



Copyright © 2009 The European Union Times – Breaking News, Latest News. All rights reserved.