Federal Court – The European Union Times ⚡ Shocking Hidden News Reports ⚡

Joe Biden is convicted of illegal internet censorship

EU Times — Thu, 08 Feb 2024 00:13:41 +0000

The Biden administration violated the free speech provision of the US Constitution by asking internet giants to remove “disinformation” about covid-19 during the pandemic. A federal court has concluded that, reports the New York Times. EU-style rules on “disinformation” and censorship by internet giants will not be able to be introduced in the US, unless […]

The post Joe Biden is convicted of illegal internet censorship first appeared on The European Union Times ⚡ Shocking Hidden News Reports ⚡.

U.S. Supreme Court Issues Landmark Decision: Constitution is Void

EU Times — Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:27:45 +0000

The U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark decision that serves to allow judges to void the Constitution in their courtrooms. The decision was issued on January 18, 2011, and the Court did not even explain the decision (Docket No. 10-632, 10-633, and 10-690). One word decisions: denied. Presented with this information and massive proof that […]

The post U.S. Supreme Court Issues Landmark Decision: Constitution is Void first appeared on The European Union Times ⚡ Shocking Hidden News Reports ⚡.

Ban on gay marriage overturned

EU Times — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:05:08 +0000

Appeal promised after federal judge finds state’s Prop. 8 unconstitutional. A federal judge declared California’s ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional Wednesday, saying that no legitimate state interest justified treating gay and lesbian couples differently from others and that “moral disapproval” was not enough to save the voter-passed Proposition 8. California “has no interest in differentiating […]

The post Ban on gay marriage overturned first appeared on The European Union Times ⚡ Shocking Hidden News Reports ⚡.

Argentine Justice considered that to offend another person for being Jewish it's not discrimination

EU Times — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:02:46 +0000

The Chamber considered that Ferderal Camera expressions of a man against another for being Jewish does not constitute “persecution or racial hatred”, as requested by victim, but represent an offense for “threats”. The judges Eduardo Eduardo and Farah Freiler resolved in this sense a question of jurisdiction arising between the federal and ordinary justice, following […]

The post Argentine Justice considered that to offend another person for being Jewish it's not discrimination first appeared on The European Union Times ⚡ Shocking Hidden News Reports ⚡.