Canada’s government, under the leadership of Justin Trudeau, has proposed legislation that empowers judges to impose house arrest on individuals if they fear they could commit a hate crime in the future. Critics argue that this move is overly authoritative and could stifle free speech, hindering open discussions.
The online harms bill, introduced by the Liberals, encompasses various measures aimed at protecting children and prosecuting hate crimes. One contentious provision suggests granting judges the authority to place individuals under house arrest if there is a concern they might commit a hate crime in the future. The person in question could also be subjected to wearing an electronic tag if requested by the attorney-general.
Justice Minister Arif Virani defended the proposed measures, asserting that they could serve as a crucial tool to safeguard potential victims. Virani emphasized the importance of restraining individuals exhibiting behaviors targeting minority groups.
The potential peace bond sought against individuals could include preventative measures such as restricting proximity to places of worship or limitations on internet use. Virani contends that these measures could aid in de-radicalizing individuals who consume harmful content online and subsequently act violently in the real world.
While assuring that content deemed “awful but lawful” would remain online, Virani stressed the necessity of meeting a high threshold to utilize these proposed powers. The bill, known as Bill C-63, unveiled on February 26, introduces a new hate crime offense with a maximum penalty of life imprisonment for severe cases.
Additionally, the bill aims to compel online platforms to promptly remove child sexual abuse material and non-consensual sexual content. Pierre Poilievre, the opposition leader, criticized the proposed legislation, emphasizing his party’s stance against censoring opinions.
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association expressed concerns about the potential misuse of the bill, cautioning that it could lead to violations of expressive freedom, privacy, protest rights, and liberty. The bill also allows people to file complaints with the Canadian Human Rights Commission over perceived online hate speech, with those found guilty possibly facing compensation claims up to C$20,000.
Critics worry that these measures may inadvertently suppress free speech, particularly in areas such as comedy or controversial discussions. Some fear that the threat of Human Rights Tribunal involvement could lead to self-censorship, impacting comedians and commentators who may face significant fines even if complaints don’t progress.
RELATED ARTICLES
- Washington offers $2,000 rewards to residents who report neighbors of 'wrongspeak'
- Canada Borderline Bans Christianity, Outlaws Reading Aloud From Bible in Public
- Soviet Canada will Jail people FOR LIFE over Hate Speech and $70K Fines over Conspiracy Theories
- New Canadian Bill Aims to Fine and Jail 'Promotion of Fossil Fuels'
- Trudeau Says He Feels 'Serene and Confident' Over Illegal Decision To Freeze Protestors' Bank Accounts
Loading ...
