https://www.eutimes.net/2020/03/21-million-chinese-cellphone-users-disappear-in-3-months-of-coronavirus-pandemic/

Isn’t it possible that there are millions of Chinese people who are rebelling against this invasive feat of espionage, who refuse to be tracked by the Chinese government and thus who decided to get rid of their cell phones and hence, becoming “incognito” to the government that relies on those cell phones for tracing all their movements and activities?

There is also the possible connection between Chinese predominance in 5-G technology as opposed to the rest of the world. How would that be connected to the role of the Virus in slowing down Chinese progressive leadership in that technology worldwide? Would other “interests” be profiting by slowing-down Chinese advances in 5-G technology, which would then, allow them to catch-up in, order to compete in world-wide markets, with the Chinese who have “beaten them” to it?

Speculation, suggestion, preconception, presupposition, or educated surmise must not drive validly-proven reproducible Science and objectively corresponding Logic. But rather, real facts and real events ought to govern data gathering for scientific analysis, after which, an explanation can be theorized for testing in light of the accumulated documented material evidence or objective data, which would then serve, as the material basis, substance, or foundation, for designing a befitting effective practicable solution.

As they say, “there is a method to the madness.” However, it is the “abstractions in our heads” that must agree with the facts already on the ground, and not the other way around.

We cannot have a preconceived invalidated opinion to then try to impose it upon contrary facts that do not support our preconceived educated surmise.

Thus, until the “abstraction in our heads” corresponds to, matches, or supports observed and experienced documented direct material physical proven factual evidence, we cannot declare our theoretical explanation (mental understanding or linguistic explanation) to be scientifically proven-valid or supported by the facts.

In short, our “mental explanations” (theories/concepts/hypotheses) explaining the causes-and-effects relationships embedded within a real event, must first, correspond to the external objective facts corroborating such abstract mental linguistically formed ideas-based conceptual “linguistic frames of explanation.”

Our Mind-contents, components, or constituents, i.e., ideas, thoughts, concepts, hypotheses, theories, etc…, must agree with the real facts, and the “objective facts out-there,” cannot be distorted or manipulated to “fit into” our preconceived mental abstract linguistic explanations. We cannot say “we’ll make them fit” into our own invalid unproven unsupported theoretical explanations. That’s not real Science.

The Human Mind is skilled at “finding iterative patterns” (patterns that repeat themselves, e.g., Revolution and Rotation: Electrons revolve around the atomic nucleus; Planets revolve around the Sun), as well as “anomalies,” or “exceptions” to the regularly observed uniformly executed “iterative uniform patterns,” e.g., Revolution and Rotation: Perihelion Shift of Planet Mercury.

And questions embodied in: “Who, When, What, Where, Why and How,” must be answered in accordance with “the greater number of real facts” embedded within the objectively observed patterns of events — (we cannot know every thing 100%, due to Entropy, which Immanuel Kant refers to a, “Der Ding an sich”), so that, if something else, e.g., a fact or event, does not fit into the objectively observed patterns of events, then, we can ask “why” that “anomaly” is showing up, to then, proceed in determining causes-and-effects relationships proving such an “anomaly.”

A explanatory standard supported by iterative facts fitting into a specific pattern of events, allows us to establish cause-and-effects relationships, that are supported by the facts, while also, allowing us to understand why such an “anomaly” or “exception to the rule,” might have occurred. First, “the pattern;” and then, “the exception.”

With a standard, “deviations from the norm,” are more easily explained or corrected — in terms of cause-and-effects relationships, because such “deviations” are not explainable or “do not make logical sense,” when assessed, in accordance with factual cause-and-effects direct material objective physical evidence supported by corresponding factual events, processes, procedures, means and ends that pertinently fit into “the standard explanatory frame.”

The “deviation” cannot be explained or understood in terms of causes-and-effects relationships as framed within the explanatory standard, which, prescribes that, such an “anomaly” or “deviation” might be caused by other causes-and-effects relationships, that must then, be discovered or found.

That’s the objective scientific-logical application of the Scientific Method — We don’t decide the solution first, (there MUST be “cosmic background radiation”), and then, feverishly attempt to “make it fit” into the fabricated problem for it, (For, There was an initial “Big Bang explosion” singularity!) And then, go out to fudge the “finding” of such “cosmic background radiation” that would then prove there indeed was an initial “Big Bang singularity explosion.” No!

The proper question ought to be: Is there really “cosmic background radiation?” If yes, then, what does that prove?

It is then, that proper scientific analysis begins: “Who, what, where, when, why and How,” in order to determine causes-and-effects relationships accountable for such observably recorded, if any, “cosmic background radiation,” after which, a mental abstract linguistic explanatory frame, can then be designed, assigned, and prescribed for an established scientific understanding of its origin and causes, e.g., the Moon revolves in geo-synchronous orbit around Planet Earth? Then, the Scientific Method of, Why and How, etc… begins: What are causes-and-effects explanations for that observed factual real occurring event? Isaac Newton says, it’s” GRAVITY! And how is “the force of Gravity” proven to explain the closeness or nearness of orbital proximity or “attraction” of the Earth for the Moon, and vice-versa? Because, “Mass attracts Mass.”

But Newton’s Three Laws of Motion were insufficient in maintaining Gravity, as posited by Newton, as “Mass attracts Mass!” as the sole and only explanatory frame of understanding for effecting the observed regularity and constancy of relationships that operate in keeping the Moon in closed proximal orbit around the Earth, as applicable to all Space bodies revolving around other Space bodies!

Why? There is the Perihelion Shift of Planet Mercury that Newton’s explanatory frame of the force of Gravity could not resolve — It took Albert Einstein, for analyzing that “anomaly” or “exception to the rule,” i.e., Planet Mercury’s Perihelion Shift, in determining that, Gravity as simply “Mass attracts Mass” alone, does not explain or cannot explain causes-and-effects relationships accounting for the Shift in Planet Mercury’s orbital path or trajectory — For the Shift is an “irregularity in Motion” that does not correspond to the Moon’s regular, uneventful orbital path around the Earth, as explained by simply positing that the force of Gravity operates as “Mass attracts Mass.”

Thus, Einstein then, posited that not only does the force of Gravity is made manifest in that “Mass attracts Mass,” BUT ALSO in that, “Mass bends or curves Space.” Hence, the closer proximity of Planet Mercury to the Sun, at that specific orbital instance, explains its apparent Shift, due to the Star’s greater Mass “bending” or “curving” the Space where Mercury is located during its orbital trajectory as it displays the Shift.

Thus, for now, at this time in our development of Scientific Knowledge of Astrophysics, a more accurate or more complete explanation of Gravity, is that: Not only does “Mass attract Mass,” but “Mass also curves or bends Space.”

Consequently then, when there is a problem — First, we examine the “stream of factual evidence” forming “a pattern of cause-and-effects relationships” that frame a composition or content of variables and co-determinant parameters constituting the PROBLEM, to then, examine such patterns of cause-and-effects relationships making up the factual objective events, from which, a determination of the actual mental frame of explanation of the problem can then be established as the SOLUTION, that must, then, be supported and corroborated by such discovered “patterns of factual objective of evidence,” e.g., that Planet Mercury demonstrates an orbital Shift because of the expression of the exertion of the greater force of Gravity by the Star, in our Solar System, that “bends” or “curves” the Space within which Mercury is revolving, because of the Sun’s much greater Mass-in-Motion.

Thus, Einstein’s additional explanation for the execution of the Gravity force causing an “irregular Shift” not displayed by the Earth-Moon Complex, or by other revolving Planets acting under the Newtonian definition of Gravity as “Mass attracts Mass,” not only, scientifically complements Newton’s valid explanatory frame for revolving Planets, but also fulfills a more complete understanding of the Gravity force by distinctively demonstrating the causes-and-effects relationships accountable for the “anomalies” or “exceptions to the rule,” i.e., the Perihelion Shift of Planet Mercury, is complementarily explained, because, to complete Newton’s explanation of Gravity, the Gravity force is also expressed as: “Mass bends or curves Space.”

Because all validly proven scientific laws CANNOT contradict each other, but must agree in their explanatory frames consonant with the facticity of the reality that we are living in a consistently stable “UNI-verse” that is in “dynamic System equilibrium,” — and NOT in an “unregulated Chaos-verse,” willy-nilly operating in the absence of scientific principles or proven laws that effect predictable cycles of regularly occurring events, such as, Earth daily-recorded Rotation event, and Earth annually-recorded Revolution event, — while also operating as it objectively executes observably proven regularly predictable Motions and Forces, e.g., Rotation, Revolution, Gravity, Electromagnetism, etc.., such as its “Constant Uniform Motion” being consistently executed in the “Space-Time Continuum” embedded within the operational structures of our UNI-verse — where all scientifically proven reproducible valid scientific laws must also be specifically applicable where all physical conditions are materially similar; and thus, proving that, both the principles or laws discovered by Newton and Einstein, agree with a validly confirmed definition or description of the operations executed by Gravity as it effects “Motion patterns,” pertinent to revolving Space bodies, accountable for both regular orbits and exceptional orbits, i.e., That: Gravity means that, not only does “Mass attract Mass” e.g., Earth-Moon orbital complex, but also that, “Mass curves or bends Space,” e.g., Perihelion Shift of Planet Mercury.

In sum: The “mental abstraction” (“Theory”) formed after examination of the facts must fit the observed reality, (“Problem”), and not the other way around, in order to arrive at crystallizing, forming, and materializing a “fit-and-proper” Solution that does effectively resolve the Problem at hand.

Until then, (That is: until factually observed objective material evidence constituting the core of the problem (real Problem) corresponds to, or “becomes the substance and foundation of abstract understanding” for the conceptual-linguistic mental explanatory theoretical frame (Theory/Hypothesis), there is no Science in accordance with the Scientific method, that can then, be established as a deterministic, validly proven, reproducible, scientific cause(s)-and-effect(s) explanation of the specified problem at hand, for which, then, an appropriate, pertinent, corresponding, befitting, and effective SOLUTION can thereafter be accordingly designed, assigned, and prescribed, and performed.

Thus, the proper order of problem-solving processes that must follow prescriptions by the Scientific Method, are designed for establishing, that:

Truly observed real FACTS ought to determine “the substantial body of material evidence” for DIRECT ANALYSIS of a specified CORE PROBLEM(S), from which is then, derived, the cause(s)-and-effect(s) forming the THEORY/HYPOTHESIS or “conclusive frame of explanation,” sums of which, to then befittingly climax into the corresponding supported actual basis, foundation, and substance of prudently well-thought-out actions, to be taken, performed, and executed, in designing, assigning and prescribing befitting SOLUTION(S) that can then be scientifically APPLIED to objectively provide the corresponding needed RESOLUTION(s) of the originally identified specified PROBLEM(s), i.e., performing, executing, and scientifically applying real solutions that actually effectively do work in truly resolving the Problem at hand.

God bless you and God bless the United States of America! *