Comments on: Prince Andrew's Ex says Jeffrey Epstein had 'Prior Knowledge' of 9/11

By: DDearborn

DDearborn — Sun, 14 Jan 2024 02:59:06 +0000

Hmmm

regardless of the exact details of epstein’s knowledge of israel’s pending attack on 9-11, the world knows with 100% certainty that israel did in fact the exact time and location of the attacks in NY on 9-11 because they sent mossad agents posing as “movers” in their white van with a mural painted on the side depicting a plane crashing into the towers to a park in NJ across the river with a perfect view of the towers both the day before and day of the attacks. They were so certain of the location and times that they arrived 30 minutes prior to the plane strikes in time to set up a video camera on top of their van pointed straight at the towers. All 5 of the israeli mossad agents arrested in the park that morning cheered and danced as the towers fell. Later all five were given lie detector tests and all 5 failed…

This article simply provides further evidence that israel staged a false flag attack against America on 9-11 and used the deaths of 3000 Americans they killed to trick the US into totally unjustified wars in the Middle East that offered America and Americans essentially no benefits…

Please wait...

By: Curmudgeon

Curmudgeon — Thu, 11 Jan 2024 18:05:35 +0000

While the statements made by Hervey and Ben-Menashe MAY be true, where is the documentary or forensic evidence to back their claims? In Ben-Manshe’s case, unlike Viktor Ostrovsky, there have been no attempts to kill him for revealing Mossad “secrets”. Have plane tickets ever been found in Epstein’s affects? As for bribing politicians,AIPAC has had that in hand for 30+ years and has bragged about it. As with the “Epstein documents” which were unexplicably released by a federal judge on application from a 3rd party unrelated to the civil defamation lawsuit in a state court, which approved the standard sealing of documents as a condition of settlement, everything is strong on allegations, but absent actual documentary or forensic evidence.
As background, 50 years ago, my brother was accused by a teenage girl in the neighbourhood, as being the one who had stabbed her in the lane behind her house, then run away. There were no witnesses and no forensic evidence. She decided it was him because, a year later, he talked to her at the bus stop a few times. He was arrested and denied bail, spending almost a year incarcerated before trial. My brother had been in a near fatal car accident that gave him double vision in one eye, and a limp that made it impossible for him to jog or run. His lawyer called no witnesses, because there was no evidence beyond accusations. He was acquitted (quickly) after the jury was instructed NOT to take the victim’s statements at face value, because there was no corroborating evidence.
There are many, many, odd things surrounding the Epstein/Maxwell narrative, including, as Hervey herself has noted, that some of the “victims” who accused Maxwell of abuse, stated they were recruited by Roberts/Giuffre. Yet sweet innocent little Virginia is still untouched. Maxwell’s trial was its own sh#tshow with bizarre rulings and evidence given by the pilot, about “chaperones” that no one is interested in. Who/what are they, and how did they become chapeones? Hervey has also noted that, having been in Maxwell’s flat where the “infamous” photo with Andrew was taken, the table in the photo is way out of scale to its actual size, indicating the photo cannot be real. It was only after settlement did Giuffre state that it was not an original photo.
Again, all of the allegations MAY be true, but there is a dearth of hard evidence to back it up. The narrative is being shaped, including the narrative around Epstein’s “suicide”. There is much, much more going on than noise around Epstein and Maxwell.

Please wait...

By: fred stone

fred stone — Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:20:35 +0000

Was killery rodamski clinton a mossad spy too? Just asking

Please wait...