Neanderthals did go extinct so stop trolling and trying to win an argument you are not going to win against me.

I’m already aware of the alleged Neanderthal genes found in the European and Asian races, i.e., approximately 0 to 2%, but not found in the Negroid race. Big Deal!

The fact remains, if one species become absorbed by another species through interbreeding over time, the former becomes extinct regardless of how many genes may have allegedly been passed on to the latter species.

In other words, the former no longer exists as a separate species = extinction.

Netherals did not go extinct, they did not migrate out of Britian, They cross bred with the next lot of Up Right Apes out of Africa, A bred that all ready had cross bred with other up right Apes. We get our complex speach gene “gene x” from Netherals. What makes up modern man is mix bred of Up Right Apes. The Netherals Genes are stonger in north of the Alpes and in Spain & france in Europe where the majority of Netherals was. And if you done some real research there is 1 gene in the 8% that is in all modern man around the world, No one is missing this one gene, that came from this 1 female.
Modern humans are the subspecies, Homo Sapien sapiens meaning mix breding of more than 1 species to make up a subspecies. The differences in looks as come about because of the enviroment that we live in.

Whatever species, be it ape or ape/human hybrid that may have inhabited Britain pre Ice Age, is irrelevant. Such species became extinct either by migrating out of Britain due to the climatic cooling down effect or from die off as a result of the steady encroachment of the Ice Age itself.

What counts is the homo sapient sapiens that began gradually populating Britain towards the end of the Ice Age.

The people who populated Britain after the ice Age were of European origin and were not not Arab, African, Indian and/or Oriental.

Up right apes and humans branched off into different species several million years ago.

The human species evolved in other parts besides the African continent so the notion that humans only came ‘Out of Africa’ has been debunked by various scholars in the field, but the Marxist control of Western education ensures that dissent from the politically correct agenda will not be tolerated hence the reason no alternative consideration is permitted to challenge the OOA theory.

http://wakeup-world.com/2013/12/16/dna-evidence-debunks-the-out-of-africa-theory-of-human-evolution/http://wakeup-world.com/2013/12/16/dna-evidence-debunks-the-out-of-africa-theory-of-human-evolution/

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-the-out-of-africa-theory-out/

Since the Ice Age, Britain did not have people from all over the world. The indigenous peoples of Britain were derived from European stock and were not Arabs, Indians, Negroes or Orientals. Britain had a near 100% majority White population for thousands of years even before the Roman era.

The fact that there were non-Whites granted entry by various indigenous British peoples over the past millennia does not alter the fact that Britain is the ancestral homeland of White people in the same way Africa is the ancestral homeland of Blacks and Asia consists of the ancestral homelands of Asians.

It also means that each native population has the natural and inalienable right to effect the repatriation of those not of their own genetic or cultural lineage at any time they see fit.

No not all.

It as not been debunk at all, DNA mapping as proved that all up right apes came out of Africa.
Also yes Romans did bring in people in the army from Africa and Asia and some stayed after leveling the Roman army, an d there was also merchants from all areas of the Roman Empire that came to Britian and stayed. Since the Ice Age Britian as had people from all over the world, at first it was from Africa as Europe was under Ice.

Wrong!

Britain ruled other nations, yes, but Britain itself was always the ancestral homeland of White people Arab, Indian, Negroid and/or Oriental. As the article points out, some sub-Saharan Africans conscripted into the Roman army that was posted to Britannia did not confer indigenous status on said Africans. For 12,000 years since the end of the Ice Age, Britain has been inhabited by people from within Europe itself. That knowledge that White merchants and sea captains from previous eras brought back Negroes or Orientals with them from their travels did not infer any non-White claim or entitlement to White homelands. Back then, White owners did not seek the citizenship of their slaves but sometimes released them from bondage at a later juncture without returning them back to their countries of origin.

It does NOT matter that the English were not yet known as the English is derived, during the era of the Roman Empire. The fact is that the Germanic tribes from which the English descended (the Angles), would have had to be already in existence.

Let’s face it, if these Marxist indoctrinators want to play semantics to a ridiculous extreme in their attempts at historical revisionism then anyone can play that game.

For instance, one could suggest that sub-Saharan Africans weren’t known as sub-Saharan Africans, Blacks or Negroes during the time of the Roman Empire either and that since Arabs, Persians and Greeks had already set foot on the Dark Continent centuries before the Romans, should it not also be argued that since these invaders arrived there before the linguistic terms, sub-Saharan African, Negro or Black were ever invented any one of them could supposedly have been the first Africans.

Furthermore, the ‘Out of Africa’ theory has been debunked more than once within the past number of decades.