Comments on: Russia superior to US in space technology https://www.eutimes.net/2015/12/russia-superior-to-us-in-space-technology/ We deliver exclusive hidden news that you won't just find anywhere, information that nobody wants you to know about. Updated 1 minute ago. Sat, 27 Jun 2020 08:25:43 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5 By: lisa https://www.eutimes.net/2015/12/russia-superior-to-us-in-space-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-104239 Sat, 27 Jun 2020 08:25:43 +0000 http://www.eutimes.net/?p=42226#comment-104239 Great to hear all of you doing the same! Following the general public isn’t always the best path.

Please wait...
]]>
By: Lone Ranger https://www.eutimes.net/2015/12/russia-superior-to-us-in-space-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-92311 Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:28:00 +0000 http://www.eutimes.net/?p=42226#comment-92311 In reply to Rocketman.

The NK-33 engines blew up after they were refurbished by a U.S. and an Ukrainian company, FACT.
Rule nr.1 in rocket tech is if you cant copy it you shouldnt mod it either.
Now the company bought the brand new RD-181 from Russia:)
The Antares will be a success story just like the Atlas V thanks to Russia.

The RD-180 is based on the RD-170 wich were the liquid boosters on the Energia carrier system, the RD-180 is basically a light cut in half eco version of it and it still outperforms everything the U.S. currently has in the medium lift category, the RD-170 is 70/80’s tech the RD-180 is late 80’s-90’s, tech the Russians gave the U.S. the blueprints the metallurgy, even Russian scientists to teach them the know how, they still couldnt copy it, now they are buying it by the $billions from Russia.
According to United Launch Alliance and NASA the U.S. wont be able to produce an engine of similar capebiltiy till at least 2020, that means the Russians are around 30 years ahead of the U.S. in rocket tech, and thats a conservative estimate.
But hey, keep believeing that you are the mucho macho the numero uno, the Romans did tha same…Good news for the rest of the World:)

Please wait...
]]>
By: Lone Ranger https://www.eutimes.net/2015/12/russia-superior-to-us-in-space-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-92310 Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:19:00 +0000 http://www.eutimes.net/?p=42226#comment-92310 In reply to TJ.

You are living in a dreamworld, the U.S. cant even copy the RD-180, and yes they tried, so they are paying heavy $billions to Russia for each engine, United Launch Alliance bought 40 engines in the summer and they are buying another 20 early in 2016, Cöngress tried to veto it but after they realized that there is no U.S. alternatives they lifted the ban.
While the U.S. walked on the Moon, if you belive that, lol, the Russians mastered reliable high powered every day practical use of commercial rocket carriers and space stations, the core of the ISS is Russian as well (ROS).

Please wait...
]]>
By: Lone Ranger https://www.eutimes.net/2015/12/russia-superior-to-us-in-space-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-92309 Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:14:00 +0000 http://www.eutimes.net/?p=42226#comment-92309 In reply to Dirk Bowler.

Thats a solution to a problem that never existed in the first place.
Russians can launch cheaper even without landing their first stage again, you also forget that the U.S. gvot is giving billions to SpaceX, on paper it all looks good but if you take into consideration all the billions payed by you and all the taxpayers in the U.S. than they arent cheaper than the Russians at all.
A Falcon 9 needs 9 engines strapped together while an Atlas V powered by a single Russian RD-180 has the same thrust.
SpaceX cant transport people either, all the astro and cosmonauts are being launched by Russia as well as 70% of the cargo.

Please wait...
]]>
By: TJ https://www.eutimes.net/2015/12/russia-superior-to-us-in-space-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-92303 Wed, 30 Dec 2015 19:20:00 +0000 http://www.eutimes.net/?p=42226#comment-92303 When the Rooskies walk on the moon, using US micro-electronics technology of course, I might begin to worry a bit. They have showed no great advances to bring them toe to toe with us. They make a good cast iron, inexpensive rocket engine from the ’60s. Why not save a few bucks while we advance quietly via private investment.

Please wait...
]]>
By: Rocketman https://www.eutimes.net/2015/12/russia-superior-to-us-in-space-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-92297 Wed, 30 Dec 2015 14:53:00 +0000 http://www.eutimes.net/?p=42226#comment-92297 In reply to Rocketman.

Correction to the above: The author is quoting a counter-terrorism analyst who used to be a US Army psychological warfare officer. The author is still an idiot because he is sourcing his information from someone who don’t know what they’re talking about. His source is quite the idiot too!

Please wait...
]]>
By: Rocketman https://www.eutimes.net/2015/12/russia-superior-to-us-in-space-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-92296 Wed, 30 Dec 2015 14:44:00 +0000 http://www.eutimes.net/?p=42226#comment-92296 So the author is currently a counter-terrorism analyst and used to be a US Army psychological warfare officer. hmm… what credibility, then, is there in anything he has to say about the U.S. space program and aerospace industries. The Russians are not more advanced than the U.S. in these areas and never have been. The rocket engines we buy from Russia are 1960’s designs and in the case of the RD-180 the only reason we’re buying from them is that after the cold war was over and we were friends with the Russians, trade studies for the evolution of the Atlas family of launch vehicles showed an economic advantage to using the RD-180. Also in the case of the NK-33 AKA AJ-26 that Orbital Sciences used on their Antares Launch Vehicle again the choice was made based on the bottom line. Aerojet bought a bunch of vintage 1960’s NK-33 engines that had been in a warehouse in Russia for 40 or so years, brought ’em over here and refurbished them and called them AJ-26. Then you know what happened? Two of them blew up on the test stand, one because of cracks in a fuel duct and the other because insufficient design of LOX turbo-pump bearings. Then a third blew on the bottom of the Antares launch vehicle, again a LOX turbo-pump failure. Russia’s more advanced than the U.S….. yea right you idiot of an author.

Please wait...
]]>
By: Dirk Bowler https://www.eutimes.net/2015/12/russia-superior-to-us-in-space-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-92278 Wed, 30 Dec 2015 07:16:00 +0000 http://www.eutimes.net/?p=42226#comment-92278 Comical article. The author conveniently ignores SpaceX, a US company, that has, in just 13 year, surpassed the Russians in space hardware. Has the Russian space program landed a first stage after successfully boosting a second stage with payload to an eventual orbit? No? I didn’t think so.

Please wait...
]]>
By: Lone Ranger https://www.eutimes.net/2015/12/russia-superior-to-us-in-space-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-92252 Mon, 28 Dec 2015 19:35:00 +0000 http://www.eutimes.net/?p=42226#comment-92252 We knew that already.
RD-180(Atlas V), RD-181(Antares), Soyuz 2(ESA), ROS(ISS).

Please wait...
]]>