Europe (Eurabia) is screwed!

The Weakened State:
Phase 1. As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any
given country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a
peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens.

The Preparation Stage:
Phase 2. From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to
their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the
introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby
securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure
on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves — along with
threats for failure to comply. At this point, they will work to get the
ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their
ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists
is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

The Violent Stage:
Phase 3. When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase
lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris ,
we are already seeing car-burnings. . Any non-Muslim action offends
Islam and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam , with
opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. After reaching
20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations,
sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish
synagogues.

Why don’t muslim “asylum seekers” go to Qatar, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates , Oman, Saudi Arabia or any of the other rich muslim countries? These are Islamic countries therefore more suitable for them.

Has any European country benefited by opening it’s borders to non-Europeans? Name one. Do they make Europe a safer place to live? Have they made Europe great? Are they good for tourism? Do they bring anything positive to Europe? Do they respect the citizens of Europe and the customs? Do they support themselves without burdening the tax payers? Do they burden the judicial system due to high crime rates? Do they love Europe or what they can get from her?

Do they victimize the European people in large proportions to their small numbers? Wouldn’t crimes against the European people foreshadow their true intentions? Do they trash up the areas they inhabit in Europe? If they victimize the host country’s people and trash up their land after they have been given a new start at life, wouldn’t that be like a direct “screw you”? Do they demand you to change your ways and customs so they can tolerate you? Do they respect the peoples government? Your family? Your people? Your culture?

If they are guilty of three of these questions then It would be safe to say they should not be in Europe. There is more harm than good for Europe and her people.

If a European country don’t let the hoards flood their land they are called “racist” and “Nazis” if they let them in, their country, their lives, their descendants lives will be torn apart. Which one is easier to live with? Which one does the most damage? Which choice is beneficial to the European country and it’s people? Wake up before it’s too late.

http://s747.photobucket.com/user/TheBBWolf/media/wsqzb8.jpg.html?o=1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8U36fCE_vCE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiPR0zdPU0I

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=silF8UT4mTE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gyr5XsOufw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wpd20QWRNvQ