Home » Australia, Health » Microplastic contaminates found in Sydney Harbor


Microplastic contaminates found in Sydney Harbor

 
 
 
 
submit to reddit

groenhout christopher opera house and sydney harbour bridge with crowded harbour on new years eve sydney australia 731969

Scientists in the first study of its kind have found microplastic contamination at the bottom of Sydney Harbor, which may pose a threat to the food chain, Australian media reported.

The research by the Sydney Institute of Marine Science tested 27 sites across the harbor, with researchers finding up to 60 microplastics per 100 milligrams of sediment. This was a higher volume than expected even in the cleanest and best-flushed reaches.

Microplastics are tiny fragments and threads of plastic, which are less than five millimeters long. Professor Emma Johnston from the Sydney Institute, who leads the study, told ABC Australia microplastics represent the “emergence of a new contamination in our harbors.”

Johnston explained that microplastics come from a range of sources, including fleece jackets, facial scrubs and plastic bags and bottles. But scientists still know very little about their effects on the environment.

Vivian Sim, a PhD student from the University of New South Wales, told The Sydney Morning Herald that from the sites searched in Parramatta River, Lane Cove and Port Jackson, the highest densities of fragments were found in Middle Harbour.

She also warned that there is a risk of microplastics entering the food chain.

“We actually managed to pull up a sipunculid worm today. So if your microplastic fragments are as small as a sand grain, then [the worm] is going to take up the plastics and contaminants, and then if something else comes along and eats that worm it’s going to go further up the food chain,” Sim told ABC Australia.

Further research is required to better understand what is going on in the waters. Professor Johnston however already pointed out that some microplastics contain harmfull materials such as flame retardants.

“We actually don’t know anything about their concentration or what their ecological effects are,” she said.

Several cosmetic manufacturers around the world have already started to faze them out.

Unilever, the international consumer good company, said it will stop using them all over the world by 2015 and in the US the state of Illinois has banned the production and sale of plastic microbeads in personal care products.

A report that came out last month, which was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), an official journal of the US National Academy of Sciences (NAS), found that 88 percent of the world’s oceans are covered in plastic junk. Accumulations are increasing in aquatic habitats at a rate consistent with trends in plastic production, increasing 560 fold in more than 60 years.

Source

Please wait...


RELATED ARTICLES

Did you like this information? Then please consider making a donation or subscribing to our Newsletter.

Conversation Guidelines

Starting a conversation on our website is very easy, all you need to do is to write your name, email and the comment itself. No account is required to leave a comment. Your email won't be used for any purpose whatsoever, if you want, you can even write a fictitious email. Please keep it civil, try to refrain from slurs and insults. We offer Free Speech rights to our comment section but please take note that the comment section is moderated so certain comments may be held for moderation in case they triggered our automatic filters. If your comment is on hold for moderation and you can't see it anywhere there is no need to repost it. Don't worry, it doesn't mean it won't get approved. Please patiently wait and check back later.



Copyright © 2009 The European Union Times – Breaking News, Latest News. All rights reserved.