Putin and the Russians are not trying to keep Ukraine out of the EU. They are concerned about protecting the rights of the Russian-speaking minority there. But the rules as dictated by “the US corporate government” and its EU slaves are not allowing them to do that, while at the same time the Ukrainian government and the EU do not accept (or are not able to enforce) their own responsibilities to do what they are not allowing the Russians to do. I want to see Putin win the chess game, but without the EU disintegrating. It’s OK thinking that Putin is a better chess player, but remember that the other side doesn’t want to play chess. It wants to overturn the table and and the chessboard on it.

W. Hall Greece says:
20/06/2014 at 4:21 pm
I want to live in Europe. Like the Ukrainians (or at least the Ukrainians who do).

I live in the Netherlands and I want out of the EU . People in the Netherlands , France and GB are waking up. United States is bankrupt and is being kept on life support by fraud , and also the EU . End of petrodollar is near .
Declaration of bankruptcy of the US corporate government is coming soon . The only option for Obama and his gang are Proxy wars . In the mean time : Putin’s aide proposes anti-dollar alliance to force US to end Ukraine’s civil war
Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/2014_06_18/Putins-aide-proposes-anti-dollar-alliance-to-force-US-to-end-Ukraines-civil-war-8030/
and “Bolivian leader urges dissolution of UN Security Council – media”
Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/news/2014_06_15/Bolivian-leader-Evo-Morales-urges-to-dissolve-UN-Security-Council-media-5441/
America will be isolated . Putin / the Russians are the best Chess players . Better than Barry Soetoro’s master Zbigniew Brzezinski . As Nuland said :, F@ck the EU !!!

Exchanging ideas is never a wasted time, Im thankfull for our conversation even if I disagree with you.

I watched it didnt convince me sorry, academics arent living in the reail world neither do most of politicians, most of the facts were wrong or twisted I can now see where you logic comes from.
The guy was in one point right japan wanted to capitulate even before the nuke attacks their only condition was to grant immuntiy to their emperor wich was granted anyways after the war, but the US. wanted to show off its power so they dropped them, on civilians wich violated multiple points on the Geneva convention and basic Human rights.
But you are still wrong, nukes wont go away anytime soon so dont hold your breath.
Tricking the US. and Russia into a nuclear war would be the end and it almost happened multiple times but on the other hand nukes are the sole reason why there was no WWIII yet, the globalists arent sure if they would survive it, probably thats the reason they want to erode it to the point where they can launch their planetry genocide without the fear of being nuked.

Carefull you are losing it.

Oh I almost forgot the INF Agreement that you were mentioning worked on both sides so not only did Russia ditch some of its short and middle range missiles but also the US. because there were too many nukes and fingers were itching on both sides, still cruise missiles and ICBM’s remained in service in fact Russia developed on them while the US. only maintained the older ones.
It was also more economical less weapons less maintenance and lets face it there is not much of a difference if you can destroy Earth 20 times in a row or only 3 times.
Its also worth mentioning that the US. is now in worse shape then the Soviet-Union was in the end of the 80’s, Russias economy is doing well while the US. falls apart, interesting in light of your theory, so the US. owns Russias nuke arsenal but Russia is doing much better and isnt overrun by the US. even though they should be defensless against a nuke power? sounds legit, Oh wait…

The Soviet-Union was never attacked it fell apart due to economical reasons and not military and political they couldnt compete with the banksters on wall street and the FED printing out federal reserve notes aka petro dollars out of thin air, combine that with a socialistic economy producing too many weapons and you got the results, Russians were not the second biggest nuclear power by the way they were numero uno with more than 30.000 nukes.
Basic facts are going against your statements the US. wants to encircle Russia, China and Iran they do everything to achieve that economic warefare,global wiretapping,paid PR campaigns 24\7, proxy wars arming massmurdering terrorists who kill rape and torture man woman and children, but if thats the case why wouldnt they simply nuke them? or threat the Russians with nukes to capitulate to them, why would the Russians upgrade their military if it was useless?why wouldnt the US. take Russias oil and gas like they use to do with other countries? conventional warefare against nukes is usless no matter what you think, so you see the problem with your logic its simply false.
I give up on you, you twist reality and facts and keep repeating it, its no use to argue with you, have a nice day bye, If you wanna live in lala land then be my guest.

corrected the typos,it happens when I type fast I like being a grammaz nazi on myself yeahhhh:)

The Soviet-Union was never attacked it fell apart due to economical reasons and not political they couldnt compete with the banster on wall street and the FED printin out federal reserve notes aka petro dollars, combine that with a socialistic economy producing too much weapons and you got the results, Russians were not the second biggest nuclear power by the way they were numero uno with more than 30.000 nukes.
Basic facts are going against your statements the US. wants to encircle Russia, China and Iran they do everything to achieve that economic warefare,global wiretapping,paid PR campaigns 24\7, proxy wars arming massmurdering terrorists who kill rape and torture man woman and children, but if thats the case why wouldnt they simply nuke them? or threat the Russians with nukes to capitulate to them, why would the Russians upgrade their military if it was useless?why wouldnt the US. take Russias oil and gas like they use to with other countries? conventional warefare against nukes is usless no matter what you think, so you see the problem with your logic its simply false.
I give up on you, you twist reality and facts and keep repeating it, its no use to argue with you, have a nice day bye, If you wanna live in lala land then be my guest.

The US. never atteacked another country whom also had nukes, coincidence?, sorry to break your delusions but deterrence works, just because you want to live in a nuke free world and to think that everybody will respect wont became reality, the moment you disarm yourself you are done.
Gorbachev was an idiot by the way probably a british double agent, but on the other hand all US. presidents were hand picked by the elite since Kennedy, so its a twisted game, the right hand often doesnt know what the left is doing.