The description of “anti-immigrant” is often used by the pro-immigration lobby and the media to try and make it a personal issue against individual immigrants, as though we simply “hate” them for who they are.

The matter is not one of individuality or “xenophobia”, but the process and change as a whole. The process is immigration and the issue is the ensuing ‘race replacement’ of the indigenous British peoples.

Not many of us are against anybody for who they are or where they may have come from. What we are against is what is happening to our nation and our people.

So although I do realise that the title of this article is taken from the original source at pressTV, I hope in the future that this distinction can be made, or that other readers will be able to pass on the argument I have made (that distinguishes liberal propaganda from that of what the issue really is), whenever they are presented with such a ‘loaded’ term as them being ‘anti-immigrant’.

It may only be a slight difference, and one thing may well go with the other, but I think it is an important distinction to make when talking about immigration as a process and as a whole.

Thanks.