Right it wouldn’t make sens if UN will work like it should. Corruption and influence of Zionists within is widely spread. Putin is showing how serious he is and this make perfect sens.

The Infowars story about two events, nuke warhead transfer and Pentagon firings omits the seismic event, and does require some speculation to connect dots, but assigning the Russian missile test as a “response” is really reaching to connect some far apart dots.

Assuming one is familiar with logical fallacies, such as Post Hoc Ergo Prompter Hoc, filling in the blanks is not so simple. http://www.logicalfallacies.info/

The fallacy of affirming the consequent is committed by arguments that have the form:

(1) If A then B
(2) B
Therefore:
(3) A

The first premise of this argument notes that if a state of affairs A obtained, then a consequence B would also obtain. The second premise asserts that this consequence B does obtain. The faulty step then follows: the inference that the state of affairs A obtains.

Examples

(1) If Fred wanted to get me sacked then he’d go and have a word with the boss.
(2) There goes Fred to have a word with the boss.
Therefore:
(3) Fred wants to get me sacked.

This argument is clearly fallacious; there are any number of reasons why Fred might be going to have a word with the boss that do not involve him wanting to get me sacked: e.g. to ask for a raise, to tell the boss what a good job I’m doing, etc. Fred’s going to see the boss therefore doesn’t show that he’s trying to get me fired.

(1) If Zeus was a real, historical figure, but the Catholic Church covered up his existence, then we wouldn’t have any evidence of a historical Zeus today.
(2) We don’t have any evidence of a historical Zeus today.
Therefore:
(3) Zeus was a real, historical figure, but the Catholic Church covered up his existence.

1. If Obama wanted to nuke S. Carolina, Obama would have to trust a Pentagon Nuclear Force Commander to do it;

2. Obama fired the Nuclear Force Commander for lack of trust;

3. Therefore, Obama wanted to nuke S. Carolina.

It’s an incredible story to say that a Russian missile test that, as a practical matter, had to be planned many months ago is some sort of a response to Obama’s alleged false flag event off the coast of S. Carolina.

Even assuming anything nuclear happened, what impact would an alleged underwater detonation off the US coast have on Russia and why would a missile test be a logical response? Sorry, this news just doesn’t make sense.