If that makes government agents feel justified, then they should ask themselves how more bombs and missiles exploding in populated areas will “protect” the victims killed in the process?

This doctrine is designed to abolish the principle of state sovereignty because, it claims, that states remain “sovereign” only if their governments do not abuse their populations – in the opinion of US and British governments. If democide is alleged, then the “responsibility to protect” arises along with a fictional obligation to invade and destroy the guilty government. It is an extremely convenient way to justify world conquest.

http://youtu.be/NXg70qJQ6O0

None of those, the way I see it. He just wants to cause problems. Look at what he’s done to the American people. Given that’s nowhere near as bad as what it COULD be, but he’s still driving America into the ground. With that in mind, why should we think he cares any more about anywhere else?

ALL THIS IS IN THE BIBLE……
READ IT WW3 WILL HAPPEN

“Administration officials said Wednesday that neither the U.N. Security Council, which is deciding whether to weigh in, or allies’ concerns would affect their plans.” – Newsmax.com

This suggests that the decision has been made, Obama lied about it, and even world opinion won’t stop Obama from blowing up Syria.

So what is Obama’s secret reason for a US missile attack, to destroy evidence of US-supported rebel involvement in nerve gas attacks, or to assassinate Syria’s leader?

Or is it to merely heap misery upon misery for the Syrian people? Over 100 US Congressmen want answers, and Obama isn’t giving them any.

The big question of WHO launched the gas attack in Syria may never be answered if the evidence is destroyed in cruise missile attacks.

The question of WHY Obama wants to destroy evidence in Syria will arise, just as the question of WHY Obama ordered a military stand-down during the attack at Benghazi which killed a US ambassador. Was Obama eliminating a witness to illegal arms shipments?

The fact is, only Congress can stop a war with Syria because the decision has already been made. Obama would not have moved the military into place if he had any doubts. So when he says he hasn’t decided on an attack, he’s lying. Again. As usual.

For winning the Peace Prize, Obama shows no knowledge of how to achieve peace.

US bombs and rockets deliver more death and destruction, not messages. Syria seems to have enough of that.

America should deal with Syria in the same way Mexico and Canada deals with Syria.

Rudy is absolutely correct.

Yup.