Comments on: Russia Moves To Label US As Plutocracy, Warns Of War

By: Yorker Dave

Yorker Dave — Tue, 28 May 2013 19:04:34 +0000

The only hope we have is one that is spurned by liberals (and mostly) conservatives – working directly for foreign companies. Not companies that have US subsidiaries, but companies that compete with American companies. But attempt to get access to information on where these companies are and it is almost impossible.

Please wait...

By: anonymouss

anonymouss — Mon, 18 Mar 2013 07:21:58 +0000

People need to wake up here in America. I have often thought of leaving in recent days but where do you go? Americans are angry but fear holds them back from uprising. We see how the people are disappearing that has tried to stand against the government. Seriously…the White House has a kill list?? What kind of insanity has come to our country?? We were once respected…people once dreamed of coming here now the citizens want out and no way to get out. Government does not listen to our demands to leave our constitution alone. The rich get richer while the jobs keep vanishing. Now one in six families is on some sort of welfare. It is only increasing. Maybe a civil war would help but the government has too much backing from other countries. The people would not stand a chance.

Please wait...

By: Zharkov

Zharkov — Fri, 08 Mar 2013 02:03:05 +0000

Losing net worth is losing status for the ultra-rich, so yes, they may survive for awhile longer than others, but they will not be as wealthy as they want to be.

My feeling is that there can be no limited nuclear war except with non-nuclear states. Japan was a non-nuclear state, so two limited strikes were feasible.

War between nuclear states would be all-out war – no limits because of the “use them or lose them” doctrine.

Nuclear weapons are themselves prime targets, which is why the US, Russia, and China have mobile missile platforms. But just because the targets are moving doesn’t guarantee that they won’t be destroyed.

No enemy would launch a limited nuclear attack against a nuclear-armed state because that would be sovereign suicide when retaliation occurred.

Please wait...

By: j

Wed, 06 Mar 2013 09:08:28 +0000

In reply to Zharkov.

The elite do have places to go. They have been building underground bunkers for a decade with our money.
Also Nuclear war can be localized as well, Hiroshima for instance.

Please wait...

By: Zharkov

Zharkov — Wed, 06 Mar 2013 06:12:22 +0000

Another Sorcha Faal prediction.
Consider the source.
Nuclear war is the one kind of war that has no winners, only losers. The rich will lose everything in such a war because they will have no useful assets uncontaminated by radiation.

Please wait...

By: Jim

Jim — Wed, 06 Mar 2013 03:28:08 +0000

In reply to Bill.

Yes – now tell your government that you want more economic/resource security with Canada. After WW2 you guys said you’d be our #1 trading partner – we as the resource, and you as the manufacturer.

About the country that “DOSEN’T WANT US AROUND” Lets not give arms to the Syrians in their current plight. There needs to be background check on those “freedom fighter” “Syrian-rebels” that are kicking Christians out of their homes by the THOUSANDS! The country of Syria will just become another dictatorship in a sense, and more hostile to the Alawites(Islamic sect), and Christians.

Please wait...

By: Bill

Bill — Mon, 04 Mar 2013 21:08:32 +0000

It’s all bullshit because almost everyone is ignorant. Well more afraid than ignorant.
They don’t want to believe that our government is bad because that would bring fear and to many of my fellow Americans have been lived privlidged lives where they never had to fear anything and are afraid of being afraid. Just stand up with me and yell. TO HELL WITH YOU AND YOUR SLAVE CREATING PLANS. THIS IS OUR COUNTRY AND WE WILL TAKE IT BACK. AFTER FIXING OUR COUNTRY WE COULD HELP FIX THE WORLD RATHER THAN BOMBING EVERY OTHER COUNTRY IN THE WORLD THAT DOESN’T WANT US AROUND

Please wait...