Comments on: Obama: Assad may use chemical weapons against militants https://www.eutimes.net/2012/12/obama-assad-may-use-chemical-weapons-against-militants/ We deliver exclusive hidden news that you won't just find anywhere, information that nobody wants you to know about. Updated 1 minute ago. Thu, 06 Dec 2012 22:28:41 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5 By: Zharkov https://www.eutimes.net/2012/12/obama-assad-may-use-chemical-weapons-against-militants/comment-page-1/#comment-55949 Thu, 06 Dec 2012 22:28:41 +0000 http://www.eutimes.net/?p=24787#comment-55949 Governments have murdered over 200 million people in the last 100 years, so it goes without saying that governments are extremely dangerous regardless of what type of system they claim to be. Fluoride contaminants and GMO crops are slow-kill weapons that do damage over long periods of time. They will be gone someday as people realize they are more dangerous as adding lead to gasoline.

Sarin or “nerve gas” means instant death. A single drop on the skin can kill anyone. Sarin eats right through chemical weapons protective gear within a few hours and gas masks won’t protect against it for much longer than an hour.

There is good reason to worry about any government possessing such a weapon.

Governments cannot be trusted with having a monopoly on deadly weapons.

Please wait...
]]>
By: News Flash https://www.eutimes.net/2012/12/obama-assad-may-use-chemical-weapons-against-militants/comment-page-1/#comment-55945 Thu, 06 Dec 2012 20:10:20 +0000 http://www.eutimes.net/?p=24787#comment-55945 News flash! Someone is already using flouride and GMOs on innocent, non-combatant civilians. Someone must take action! Hypocrites. Death is death. Whether a bullet, chemical, fire, blade or atomic/nuclear reaction, if unprovoked lethal action is used, you are a MURDERER!!!

Please wait...
]]>
By: Zharkov https://www.eutimes.net/2012/12/obama-assad-may-use-chemical-weapons-against-militants/comment-page-1/#comment-55941 Thu, 06 Dec 2012 17:11:12 +0000 http://www.eutimes.net/?p=24787#comment-55941 The qualifier in the Syrian statement is that the Syrian “Government” will not use chemical weapons but that assurance becomes meaningless if the weapons are already in the hands of the rebels. So who has custody of the weapons at this moment?

This situation underlines the problem of government ownership of dangerous weapons. Governments cannot be trusted to not use genocidal weapons against their own citizens, as we have seen in America, Iraq, and elsewhere.

In America, our founders wanted the citizens to possess weapons, not the government.

As stated in the 2nd Amendment, the founders made it absolutely clear that armed citizens were to be the final protection against government tyranny. And their reason was that freedom for citizens was more important than the continued existence of the state.

If the people of Syria had been as fully armed as citizens are in Switzerland, the idea that a government needed chemical weapons would not exist – armed citizens would be the final deterrent against invasion.

When all dangerous weapons are controlled by a few people at the very top of an organization, then everyone’s life is at the mercy of those few, however insane they may be. Decentralization of weapons ownership actually protects citizens far better than monopoly control of weapons by a few elite.

Self-defense is a “do-it-yourself” project that places responsibility for national security back onto the citizens, where it belongs.

Please wait...
]]>