“The Big Picture” with liberal Thom Hartmann and the comment of the internet trolls (Warmongers) are nothing more than “The Big Picture of Small Minded People for … “Big Hidden Agenda and Big Profit”, period. :roll:

So what do they think WW3 is about? Well, these idiots are afraid to tell you the truth. IT IS ABOUT NUCLEAR THERMAL WAR, but it’s only 1000 times worse than just radiation. Perhaps, they are the ones who should take some science classes or at least be truthful to the readers.

WW1, WW2, cold war and everything in between have taken so many lives, especially the YOUNG MEN. If you don’t believe me ask the Yankees, the British and the (native) French. :( (France is now filled with immigrants from the Eastern countries since the 14th century.)

Thom Hartmann has lectured the world that American people do not need or deserve their Second Amendment Right. As you heard the American people believe it’s their Constitutional Rights and to PREVENT tyranny or genocide which happened in many other countries…. even before and well after Christ.

It seems like Thom Hartmann’s arguments are always biased and shallow, perhaps due to his minimal understanding of the subjects.

Pro-Justice,

do yourself a favor and get in touch with REALITY.You float on WISHFUL THINKING.Get into a physics course (not “PHYSICAL COURSE”) and LEARN the FACTS about NUCLEAR ENERGY and nuclear plants.

Whistling past the graveyard, homie.
And you should buy a Geiger counter to check that theory of yours before you bet your ass on it.

:-D Excellent comment Ruth. Thank You!

“…as billions breathe in ‘hot’ particles on a daily basis, for years or generations, just from this plant?”

… there will be more to come. Statistically, it cannot be avoided.

More catastrophic accidents are imminent: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SruTxZJyMkA&list=PL69D1BB4DB0D8F834&index=24&feature=plpp_video

ACCEPTING nuclear energy is nothing more than pure propaganda. Usually, it sounds like a typical NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT TACTIC to convince people (mainly the British and the U.S. + Japan) to accept nuclear energy sources because radiation ‘most likely’ won’t destroy our planet. :roll: Oil fields are NOT the ONLY answer. Never has been.

…

The U.S has many nuclear power plants for many years, and everything has NOT been under control. So why is it that all of a sudden they are able to assure us all is safe? Especially if one considers the lies and cover ups that have continued for over 50 years. Example: Simi Valley Nuclear Accident. (google it) :oops:

Nuclear facilities CANNOT be built to survive anything, ESPECIALLY a 10.0 earthquake. They CANNOT ALWAYS be shut down and contained using fail-safe devices, and must be built by trustworthy specialists. …or built by the lowest bidder whose ‘trustworthy’ expert specialists ALL have a conflict of interest. Good luck on that trustworthy thing.

It’s NOT worth the risk, it never has been. :-x

What happens when a plant releases 400 to 700 pounds of plutonium and 20-100 TONS of uranium dust into a high altitude plume?

What happens when globally, as billions breathe in ‘hot’ particles on a daily basis, for years or generations, just from this plant?

Watch for lots and lots of unexplained health issues, (all kinds of cancers, all organs, glands and systems) in humans and all animals, rapidly increasing in number and frequency, over the next few years.

Studies showing the effects of low dose radiation.

National Academy of Sciences Low-Dose Radiation Report
http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11340&page=R1
Data tables used, 12D-1 and 12D-2:
http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11340&page=311
http://www.nap.edu/openbook/030909156X/gifmid/311.gif
How to scale that data to unique exposure scenarios, Annex 12D, Example 1:
http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11340&page=310
15-country study of nuclear-worker cancer risk
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17388693
Table 5 shown is from Part II of the study
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17388694
http://iangoddard.com/15countries_Part2_Table5.png
Jacob et al. (2009) meta-analysis of nuclear-worker studies
http://oem.bmj.com/content/66/12/789.full.pdf
Editorial on Jacob et al. quoted
http://oem.bmj.com/content/66/12/785.extract

And the middle east is the obvious place to get oil. Because oil is the engine that keeps the economy running.

The media’s objectives are: :roll:

1. Democrat Obama to win again since he can not run for a 3rd term, so anything goes. War will be on the horizon.

2. Democrat Hillary Clinton will be his next vice president (not Joe Biden/the current VP, I believe he knows his place.)

3. Sarkozy (France) will win another term. The elite considers him to be a highly valuable player at this time. And after WWIII, Nicolas Sarkozy may become the last world ruler.

The U.S has many nuclear power plants for many years, and everything has been under control. So why is it that all of a sudden they are unable to control them? :(

Nuclear facilities can be built to survive anything, including a 10.0 earthquake. They can be shut down and contained using fail-safe devices, and must be built by trustworthy specialists. :-D

The British refuses to learn from history, the British. :(

And the U.S has enough oil to last the next 200 years as the experts have said, so we don’t need to go to war. :-D