Comments on: US "Trespass Bill" will make protest illegal

By: bpf53

bpf53 — Mon, 05 Mar 2012 23:55:53 +0000

Hate to tell the left-wingers but that is a fake (or photo-cropped) picture… used to further ans anti-American message..

Please wait...

By: Observer

Observer — Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:57:38 +0000

“Those who make a peaceful revolution impossible, will make a violent one inevitable.” -JFK

Please wait...

By: Dave Dave

Dave Dave — Fri, 02 Mar 2012 03:21:18 +0000

You do great damage to your credibility when you post pictures like the picture you have posted with this article.

“New World Police ?” Bullshit! We all fear the possibility of such occurring in the near future, but we are not there yet.

Explain to those of us who desperately want to prevent and stop such a draconian future from occurring how your methods of propaganda make you any different from those you seek to discredit.

You have taken yet another imposition on peoples liberty and totally discredited yourselves and the message you want to convey by FAKING such an image.

This is how you destroy your credibility.

Please wait...

By: Auburn

Auburn — Thu, 01 Mar 2012 14:13:19 +0000

This bill does NOTHING to further impede our First Amendment rights. This is ONLY an amendment to a law passed in 1971 (tardy to the incensed party?), amended several times since (to more specifically define parameters under which this law can be used by law enforcement), and once again, made more specific to PROTECT the First Amendment. The only change I is in the Punishment subsection (b). It currently says “ANY person, during and in relation to the offense, uses or carries a deadly or dangerous weapon or firearm”, being amended to say “THE person, during and in relation to the offense, uses or carries a deadly or dangerous weapon or firearm”. It currently allows for anybody who is arrested in violation of this law to be punished for ANYBODY in their group carrying a weapon, EVEN IF THE PERSON ARRESTED was NOT in possession of said weapon, changed IN THIS CONTROVERSIAL AMENDMENT to specify that a person can only be punished for possession of a weapon (under these pretty specific conditions) if they, themselves, are in possession of said weapon. Basically, it protects protesters MORE rather than less.

Please wait...

By: Concerned

Concerned — Thu, 01 Mar 2012 10:12:55 +0000

:( Sounds almost like the same road another country traveled in history:
“Some individuals did protest, but organized protests and resistance were almost impossible because of the secret police and the terror apparatus. Public protests, for example, in the media or by demonstrations were banned. The last anti-government demonstration in Nazi Germany took place on 8 February 1933 and the police opened fire on the crowd almost at once.

Source: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Why_didn't_the_Germans_protest_or_try_to_stop_the_Holocaust#ixzz1nrELbzAU

Please wait...

By: Ripples

Ripples — Thu, 01 Mar 2012 03:23:29 +0000

It’s sad watching our American freedoms go out the window and the sheep are letting it happen because they’re more interested in the Kardashians or Lindsay Lohan or those other Hollywood jerks. Our forefathers must be spinning in their graves at what this country is turning into. I’m glad I left when I did so I can preserve the memory of how the United States USED to be.

Please wait...