Comments on: Surgeon says human body did not evolve

By: chantale

chantale — Thu, 19 Sep 2013 01:16:41 +0000

about the wisdom teeth thing. my mom is fifty four years old and she never go her wisdom teeth yet and she may never get them. and even if we we’re taught that the wisdom teeth would come in at what 17 to 20 years old, doesn’t mean it happens for everyone in the whole world so this could be a sign of evolution. plus some kids eye teeth (vampire teeth) don’t come in on there own. like me for example. the dentist had to expose them and pull them down with braces so that they would be present. this probably occurred because we do not eat raw meat like our ancestors did.

Please wait...

By: Kris

Kris — Sat, 23 Jun 2012 16:20:12 +0000

“…a wonderfully constructed human body is exactly what an all-wise Creator would make…”

What little-minded tripe. A wonderfully constructed body? How many babies do not live? Or how many people have terrible backs and knees? How about failing eyesight and hearing? We’re “constructed” with all the same potential genetic flaws of other mammals.

Please wait...

By: jason

jason — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 01:35:43 +0000

Those that are trapped in the religion of evolution will never listen to reason, they must blindly follow there prophet darwin. :-D

Please wait...

By: cm

cm — Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:26:39 +0000

suppose we consider the concepts of darwinism and the unfolding body of knowledge in the light of scientific truth as individuals accepting that they need to evovle away from tired and clouded internal dialogues that wont consider perhaps that their lives have the ability to reach unification with invitng divinity.

Please wait...

By: Bec

Bec — Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:26:08 +0000

In reply to anthony.

Anthony, everyone is born without wisdom teeth… we always have. They come in on average between 17-25 yrs old.

Please wait...

By: anthony

anthony — Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:10:46 +0000

Really???? Then why are kids born without wisdom teeth now….evolution.

Please wait...

By: Balder

Balder — Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:31:20 +0000

I’m suspicious when I see Kuhn use the words “the human body” so many times. For “the human body” as a physiological entity, is no more complex than the body of a mouse or a pig. So it is as if he starts out on some religiously inspired crusade to “disprove” Darwinian evolution. Or did Kuhn really mean that the beginning of simpler life forms also needs these “all-or-nothing systems”? It doesn’t come out very clear.

I agree that the ideas of Darwin probably don’t explain every aspect of evolution, and I can also suspect or sense “non material” or “spiritual” factors. In my view some form of “Devine Creation” could very well play a big part, but not necessarily without some kind of physical Darwinian evolution as the way to express this phenomenon in another dimension.

In my view the one does not exclude the other.

Please wait...

By: bg

bg — Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:58:58 +0000

Death in Service.

Please wait...

By: Ray Comfort's Banana

Ray Comfort's Banana — Sun, 12 Feb 2012 11:30:41 +0000

Oh my god you must be true because I’m irreducible of my heart!

Just because there are no answers to some questions like “how this could have happened?” does not automatically mean everything has been constructed by an unexplainable divine operator (like the overwhelmingly moronic god from bible / allah from quran / jahve from torah / you name it from you name it).

What a load of bullshit “news”. Just like Ray Comfort’s “Banana is proof of gods existence”.

Please wait...