Comments on: Nuke carrier leads US strike force into Syrian waters

By: David Fine

David Fine — Wed, 11 Jan 2012 03:40:48 +0000

You are right ,but the russian aircraft carrier is better armed and both make a great target in this hi tech world The subs on both sides will have hsve fun with these

Please wait...

By: dave

dave — Thu, 22 Dec 2011 06:00:08 +0000

In reply to cosmic.

Cosmic
I,m glad to see a fellow american who actuly knows there history
vote forRonPaul, he’s our only hope

Please wait...

By: scotty

scotty — Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:43:45 +0000

I think its funny how those commie bastards can think they can out propaganda us there fucking idiots

Please wait...

By: taib

taib — Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:49:18 +0000

In reply to JanB.

but China is a selfish country.

Please wait...

By: taib

taib — Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:46:22 +0000

Bomb Assad! :-x what r they waiting for!

Please wait...

By: Jean-Francois Morf

Jean-Francois Morf — Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:33:43 +0000

Is there not any 007 secret agent capable of killing Assad without destroying all Syria?
What is the goal: killing Assad or trying new sorts of bombs?

Please wait...

By: JanB

JanB — Mon, 28 Nov 2011 00:40:00 +0000

Such a nuclear carrier only serves the profit of corporations which manufacture weapons at the expense of taxpayers who get the bill. The expectation is that countries which might be targeted by such weapons, will have to buy similar weapons. When that happens, it results in an arms race, won in advance by Washington because its currency is the global reserve currency and the Fed can print anything out of thin air with impunity.

This (proably familiar Cold War) scenario has changed (text in Engrish):

“Recently, the PLA Chief of General Staff Chen Bingde said Dongfeng-21D anti-ship ballistic missiles is still in test, but U.S. analysts believe that although the Dongfeng-21D can not play some of the features, but already have a certain level of combat capability, adding that China will eventually may produce about ten thousand of the missiles, which cost the equivalent of the United States the cost of building an aircraft carrier.”

http://wuxinghongqi.blogspot.com/2011/07/china-will-build-ten-thousand-dongfeng.html

How many of such missiles would be required to sink the entire NATO fleet?

If China can design and construct the Dong Feng-21, Russia can produce something equivalent, or better.

Please wait...

By: cosmic

cosmic — Sun, 27 Nov 2011 18:24:15 +0000

GHW Bush’s father, Prescott, aided and abetted the Nazi war machine prior to and during military hostilities and proclaimed the virtues of fascism all while attemptIng a fascist coup against the legitimate US gov’t of FDR. Furthermore, as Pres. Truman stated, the CIA is little more than an enormous criminal syndicate working to the advantage of the global oligarchs. The big problem with most Americans is they know only the distorted history they have been fed

Please wait...

By: Steve

Steve — Sun, 27 Nov 2011 16:06:52 +0000

In reply to mig welders.

George HW Bush was a powerful man (head of the CIA) coming form a powerful family. It’s a very appropriate name. Do you guys even have carriers?

Please wait...

By: mig welders

mig welders — Sun, 27 Nov 2011 11:01:15 +0000

That is one powerful looking aircraft carrier, shame about the name. :)

Please wait...