Obviously, the Kansas City fed examiners found zero evidence of discrimination.

You had an atheistic examiner who went ballistic when he saw Christian displays in the bank. What’s remarkable, is that KC fed management fully supported him until the politicians got involved.

This is not simply a case of a rogue examiner operating on his own. Apparently, the bullying went on for about one week. During that time, KC fed officers became aware of what was going on and gave it their complete support.

The atheistic examiner probably started the process. But his managers supported and encouraged it. Only when Senator Imhofe compained to bernanke, and bernanke called KC fed president, tom hoenig, was this stopped.

Even still, go to the KC fed’s website. They posted a statement from hoenig, but admitted to no wrong doing. The KC fed merely stated that bank employees can wear personal jewelry.

The KC fed is trying to reserve its right to relaunch its attack against Payne County Bank. They’re just waiting for the attention to die down.

The federal reserve bank of kansas city, which committed this act of thuggery, has banned the celebration of Christmas among its own employees for several years.

The fed’s interpretation of Reg B is guided by its anti-Christian bias. Reg B refers to “The use of words, symbols, models or other forms of communication in advertising that express, imply, or suggest a discriminatory preference or a policy of exclusion in violation of the Act.”

So, they’re saying that members of a bank, by merely saying that they are Christian, are discouraging non-Christians. The federal reserve has a poisoned view of Christians. Due to the federal reserve’s satanic hatred of Christ, its members fail to comprehend what Christianity stands for.

So, what’s next? If anyone in business says that they are Christian, they are automatically assumed to be discriminating? Will Christianity, itself, be made illegal?

Email KC fed president tom hoenig at [email protected]. Tell him that his anti-Christian bigotry in the application of Regulation B is unacceptable.

Thanks,