Comments on: US Orders Blackout Over North Korean Torpedoing Of Gulf Of Mexico Oil Rig

By: RvrRnsThruIt

RvrRnsThruIt — Sat, 09 Jul 2011 05:20:34 +0000

And those who taut their IQs usually don’t have one that high. This writer has noted that brilliant, clever and accomplished people couldn’t care less about their Stanford-Binet score.

Please wait...

By: Rozy

Rozy — Wed, 18 May 2011 08:32:18 +0000

US should worried about North Horea new ballistic “Rodong” which is able to “deploy and detonate” an atomic electromagnetic pulse (EMP) device, and which if detonated high in the atmosphere could effectively destroy the American economy for years
as said ny Russian expert.

Please wait...

By: Christian Louboutin Booties

Christian Louboutin Booties — Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:21:55 +0000

Thanks for the several tips provided on this blog. I have noticed that many insurance carriers offer buyers generous reductions if they elect to insure more and more cars together. A significant number of households include several automobiles these days, in particular those with elderly teenage kids still living at home, and the savings upon policies can certainly soon begin. So it is a good idea to look for a good deal.

Please wait...

By: Adam

Adam — Mon, 03 Jan 2011 04:13:53 +0000

I wouldn’t put it past them at all.

Please wait...

By: Amendment II Mike

Amendment II Mike — Mon, 03 Jan 2011 03:53:47 +0000

:) I love all the differnt view on this I’ve read. I wonder what you all think of the contrail off the coast of California recently. My friend was in the Marines for 25 years says it is definately a missle contrail.
He thinks it may have been Chinese testing off our coast.
Thoughts and comments are welcome.

Please wait...

By: The Old Dog

The Old Dog — Sun, 05 Sep 2010 02:34:55 +0000

FACT: Whenever one must use the word “fact,” it rarely is. This was beautifully illustrated in that cable TV commercial that “proved” that AT&T hated puppies. Those of us with higher IQs never respond to the declaration: “FACT.” Nor are we moved by “FACT-BASED.” Saying that your side is fact-based is just a thinly veiled way of saying the other side is lying. And, as my dear departed father used to say, “The first one to call out ‘Liar!” is usually the liar.” Just a thought.

Please wait...

By: Adam

Adam — Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:50:25 +0000

Umm, check out CNN.com how bout it. Another one blew today. This time it was just a platform but still.

Please wait...

By: bb

bb — Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:07:55 +0000

Now that the well is capped and the North Korea Leader is back playing golf, don’t you all fell a little silly with all this ranting and raving about little green men?

Please wait...

By: Paul Strickland

Paul Strickland — Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:57:19 +0000

In reply to Heartland.

I agree with this post. How many times must we be lied to about nearly everything to distrust the present administration and national news media. Our adminsitration is flawed and inherently dishonest with a continuing tendency to use the Big Lie(pick one) while ignoring millions of voters. Those who are not afraid of the truth don’t need to bully others but should encourage them to find it.
Continuing lack of credibility and arrogance do not foster trust of any kind.

Please wait...

By: AntiGovernment

AntiGovernment — Sat, 03 Jul 2010 17:56:28 +0000

John Holmes eh! He was a porn star who did gay porn contracted AIDS and died,yet your calling out people based on their names! Your sir are a douche! :-x 8-O

Please wait...

By: Rygg

Rygg — Sun, 27 Jun 2010 17:10:27 +0000

In reply to Joe Heathen.

Any phone of any sort purchased after the tough on crime bill courtesy of Bill CLinton states it must “accept interference but cannot emit interference”. This means there are no illegal phone taps.

Please wait...

By: John Holmes

John Holmes — Sun, 27 Jun 2010 07:26:54 +0000

In reply to Joe Heathen.

Joe heathen. A self-proclaimed intellectual with a name like heathen? You know, Joe Bohemian, when you insult and demean Heartland, you demean yourself…. (hindu proverb.)
lol @ communicatins act of 1934, Einstein! They didn’t have cell phones in 1934. And even if that act has an umbrella embrace that encompasses wireless communications, who gives a rat’s ass? That still doesn’t give you the right to insult Heartland.
Now, Joe Provencial, let me share one of my original quotes with you, as pertains to high horses:

“High horses leave taller stacks of crap.”

GOT IT? JOE RUBE? BOY??

Signed,
Heartland’s defense attorney

Please wait...

By: Joe Heathen

Joe Heathen — Sun, 27 Jun 2010 03:06:20 +0000

‘By the way, isn’t “intercepting cellular telephone” communications illegal?”
–
If you had any familiarity with the Federal Communications Act of 1934, you’d be able to answer your question. Accordingly, are you going to seek out and read the Federal Communications Act of 1934 or will someone have to spoon feed it to you?
–
“To imply that someone who raises questions is a threat to national security is way over the top. American citizens still have the right to ask questions and engage in dialogue without being accused of an I.Q. deficit.”
–
Quote precisely any statement I’ve submitted that confirms the inference you’ve made. Ask all the questions you want to. But, why don’t you have the intellectual self-sufficiency and wherewithal to seek, on your own initiative, FACT-BASED answers to your questions?
–
Persons reveling in their intellectual shallowness and refusing to expose themselves to FACT-BASED knowledge are incapable of upholding and defending the national security of the United States.
–
I’ve certainly provided you with a vast plethora of FACT-BASED sources in my previous submittal. Are you incapable of interacting with those sources?
–
Raise yourself above the teeming, huddled, and unwashed masses and demonstrate that you can exercise your freedom of speech by using FACTS to give legitimacy to your commentaries.

Please wait...

By: Heartland

Heartland — Sun, 27 Jun 2010 02:29:41 +0000

There are many people, myself included, who do not happen to swallow hook, line, and sinker, everything which is stated as fact by our govt. and mainstream media. When one accepts everything at face value, this qualifies as gullibility, not intellectual superiority.

To imply that someone who raises questions is a threat to national security is way over the top. American citizens still have the right to ask questions and engage in dialogue without being accused of an I.Q. deficit.

If there is an aura of mistrust in our country, why would anyone be surprised? There are concerns that our president does not have a legitimate birth certificate, that we are being propelled toward socialism, and lots of other “red flags” which I won’t take time to delve into.

By the way, isn’t “intercepting cellular telephone” communications illegal?

I shall leave this forum to others who wish to banter and insult. I have no time nor desire to participate. I know of only ONE who speaks the absolute truth 100% of the time, and HE does not reside upon this earth.

Kudos to all who have exercised their freedom of speech and raised their doubts in a public forum. NEVER let anyone make you believe that you do not have the right to question what you are presented with as the truth. If what is being told is completely accurate, GREAT! If not, it will come out eventually.

Continue to have an inquiring mind (which, by the way,is an indication of intelligence)and hold dear our Constitutional rights.

God bless our USA!

Please wait...

By: Joe Heathen

Joe Heathen — Sat, 26 Jun 2010 21:46:24 +0000

If you truly want to have FACT-BASED information about the “Deepwater Horizon” catastrophe, there’s a large quantity of FACT-BASED reference sources readily available to you which you can acquire through the simple act of exercising personal intellectual responsibility and using Google or other search engines. Examples are:
–
http://www.offshore-mag.com/index.html
–
http://www.offshoresource.com/
–
http://www.pennenergy.com/index.html
–
http://www.oilvoice.com/open/
–
http://www.tbpetroleum.com.br/
–
http://www.upstreamonline.com/
–
http://www.epmag.com/
–
If you want to know about North Korea and its aspirations, you should read these publications:
–
http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/publication-search-results.cfm?criteria=%22north+korea%22&submit=Search
–
http://www.usnwc.edu/SpecialPages/SearchResults.aspx?searchtext=%22north+korea%22&searchmode=anyword
–
http://www.aspi.org.au/htmlver/22572nkorea/index.html
–
http://www.google.com/cse?cx=012395112779747368405%3Ao4el_lahrsk&ie=UTF-8&q=%22north+korea%22&sa=Search&siteurl=merln.ndu.edu%2F
(US National Defense University)
–
If you wanna have a real radio receiver, do a Google search for the following, taking great care to note the specifications as well as history of these receivers:
–
“R-389”, “R-390”, “R-390A”, “R-391”, and “51J4”
–
I have one R-389, one R-390, three R-390As, three R-391s, and one 51J4 and I listen to the world, both voice and data comms, daily. Over four decades ago, I used these same models of radio receivers to listen to military operations of certain nations and do so today.
–
If you want to listen to comms pertaining to “Deepwater Horizon”, you’re gonna need both SATCOMS and VHF capabilities. Which I have. And I also monitor everything in the RF spectrum between .5KHz and 21GHz. Which means I intercept cellular telephone and wireless comms as a hobby.
–
And, as stated in previous postings, the “Deepwater Horizon” catastrophe was a terrible chain of human failures on the part of BP. Nothing more and nothing less. To think otherwise is to reveal a depth of intellectual dysfunction that renders one a threat to US national security.
–
The questions and statements posed hereon reveal a tragic shallowness of American and other citizens who seem to delight in being intellectually bereft and incapable of exercising intellectual self-sufficiency.

Please wait...