Comments on: Putin Warns Against One World Order As US-China Military Tensions Grow

By: Avocado Globster

Avocado Globster — Sat, 04 Jun 2011 16:30:39 +0000

The heat was on..

Please wait...

By: deeperpolitics

deeperpolitics — Sat, 04 Jun 2011 06:45:50 +0000

When speaking of the US aggressive foreign policies….what we are, in truth, speaking of is the aggressive foreign policies of the corrupt, power-elite who pull the strings of the US Administration.

The ruling elite benefit off of control of the world’s economic banking systems; off of control of the oil industry; off of control of the pharmaceutical industry; and off of the never-ending, mega-billion dollar war contracts awarded to the military/industrial complex.
This power-elite has the North American populace completely misinformed and unaware of their sinister deeds, because the mainstream newscasts and press are completely ‘dummied-down’, biased, and pro-NATO-warfare.
I compiled a few blogs on my website as my own form of desk-top activism.
They can be found by Google searching:
“Fabricating the Enemy, 9/11, and Rewritten History – Bill Woollam”
http://www.blissful-wisdom.com/fabricating-the-enemy-911-and-rewritten-history.html

Please wait...

By: George China

George China — Sun, 13 Jun 2010 10:49:09 +0000

US lawmakers are concerned because for the first time in history, US ac will be sunk if they were to attack China.They want to perpetuate US military superiority ie. in a war with China,US will not suffer significant damage.
The PLA is not geared for attack but for defence and will make sure the US think twice before launching a war with China.The pLA will do whatever it takes to upgrade and make sure the Chinese won’t be subjected to US nuclear blackmail.

Please wait...

By: MyName

MyName — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 02:47:31 +0000

The problem with morality is that you cannot lead with it.
You cannot receive better morality ideas from below because it is just so much against your current morality.
Leaders cannot receive better morality ideas from people accept with random because morality is understanding thing and edjucating it is impossible but by keeping quides of the “leader” and letting him notice worlds affects by himself.
As buddist say it can be enhanced by meditation but only to certain limit without confrontation and the greates risk is that as you come the nearest of perfect morality you must not lose faith in that eccistance will grant you the greatest power eventually because near to berfect morality you must kill yourself, others, quit thinking, ect.. in warying pulses as thet is what your morality shows you then.
Because of this the belief in own omnipotence is greatest religion..
:) :)

Please wait...

By: MyName

MyName — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 02:32:36 +0000

8) There is a bossibility for China and Russia to stabilize them butit is a wery faint now.
For father to gather full controll over family he needs only 50% of familys power.
USA has been able to spend in military more than 100% of its enemies spending for 20 years now wich is sufficiently enough.
A new generation has grown into power with power and allmonst no treath to them compared to other nations.
An athelic intelligense in science(moral intelligence has nothing to do with that) has grown into them and it takes more than 100 years to us to loose it.
USA can now rock its enemies against other countries and keep them low and unable to provide simlar security to their children accept with very high morality means for ages to come.
The father has surppassed the power limit and the only way for son to grow to be more powerfull but different that his father is to surpass him in morality.
China and Russia can still win but it requires that they righteously try to provide some of them high quality purity food and wellbeing with full moral rigths and position to overtake Chinas future leadership position and still being able to do their best for the rest of their citicen.
This means that morality coverment must take over and make logical argument based laws in wich all god or it just is so and other non total wich is individual for individuals themselves based arguments are automatically discarded.
This leads to situation where huamne social thinking can win.
United States is not based on moral thinking so there will be wery bad times coming if they win.
China got it self into position by being insociall for its people and forging them to make free work for western countries anyway.

Please wait...